Siddartha (Dhritiman Chatterjee) is forced to discontinue his medical studies due to unexpected and brutal death of his father. He has to now find a job in stead. In one job interview, he is asked to name the most significant world event in the last ten years. His reply is 'the plain human courage shown by the people of Vietnam', instead of the expected - man landing on moon. The interviewer asks is he is a communist. Needles to say that he does not get the job.
He reaches a coffee shop where he is offered to work for the communist party. When he does not show any interest the party leader tells him about an opening for a medical representative. To escape from the heat and have a snooze, he goes in to a cinema. As a government propaganda newsreel is being shown before the feature, a bomb explodes in the cinema hall. In the stampede that follows, Siddartha, breaks his watch. He goes to a watchmaker but he cannot afford the repairs.
Waiting to cross the road, he notices a sexy girl. He drifts back to his days as a medical student in a flashback. The professor is explaining anatomy of female breast. Many flashbacks and dreams occur to Siddartha through the film.
On his way to hostel, he has an encounter with some hippies. Along with an ex-classmate, he goes out to see a porn film but to their disappointment, the film turns out to be not-so-pornographic.
In such constant wandering in a Calcutta, disintegrated relationships with his sister and a Naxalite (militant communist) brother, his friendship with Keya is only thing that keeps him sane.
Keya is a simple girl. They enjoy each other's company but they cannot make any commitment to each other due to the circumstances.
After yet another attempt at a job interview, Siddartha leaves the big city to take a modest job of a salesman in a far off small town. He writes to Keya that he still cherishes their relationship. And that he has heard that bird call again but this time it is for real, and not his mind. After completing the letter, he comes out to the balcony of his modest room. The bird calls again. He also hears the sombre chants of a funeral procession. As he turns to the camera, the picture is frozen.
This is the first film of the Calcutta Trilogy. The other two were and Seemabaddha (Company Limited, 1971) and Jana Aranya (The Middle Man, 1975). All the three films study the effect the big city of Calcutta has on the educated youth and the price it extracts from them.
The seventies were a difficult period for India and West Bengal. The Corruption was rampant; the Naxalite movement had created havoc in Calcutta. In fact, they had turned parts of Calcutta into 'liberated zones'. By the time the Naxalite movement died down, in 1975, Mrs. Indira Gandhi (then, Prime Minister of India) suppressed the fundamental rights and declared "Emergency" for her own political survival. Her son, Sanjay Gandhi became a dictator of sorts without any official designation. The opposition leaders were thrown into prisons.
About his social responsibilities as a filmmaker, in an interview with Cineaste magazine, Ray commented, "You can see my attitude in The Adversary where you have two brothers. The younger brother is a Naxalite. There is no doubt that the elder brother admires the younger brother for his bravery and convictions. The film is not ambiguous about that. As a filmmaker, however, I was more interested in the elder brother because he is the vacillating character. As a psychological entity, as a human being with doubts, he is a more interesting character to me. The younger brother has already identified himself with a cause. That makes him part of a total attitude and makes him unimportant. The Naxalite movement takes over. He, as a person, becomes insignificant."
In a letter to Seton in 1970, Ray wrote that Pratidwandi was the most provocative film he had made till then. The film is said to have evoked extreme reactions. "People either loved the film or hated it", Dhritiman Chatterjee told Andrew Robinson, Ray's biographer.
这么多年过去了，问题还是那些问题，我想不出答案。唯一的答案可能就是活着。
我觉得不是很好看，但我不确定孩子会不会喜欢。这就是最可悲的地方：我已经不知道现在孩子的口味是什么了。
虽然记不清原著内容了，但是很喜欢鲁西西反抗学校的转变，离谱的规则就是要打破的
郑渊洁童话改编电影《皮皮鲁与鲁西西之罐头小人》我们这代人基本上也是看郑渊洁的动画片长大的啊！这次能拍成电影，本身就已经很值得点赞了！此片整体还是不错的，剧情轻松欢快，小演员们表演的也都不错！很适合家长陪着孩子一起观看，也算是探讨了成绩和兴趣爱好的取舍吧！特效也是此片的一大亮点，整体看下来，特效也是说的过去的，唯一让我觉得不太好的地方是，罐头小人的来，和最后得知自己是从哪里来，都有点过于突兀了，只是一笔带过而已，这点是我觉得此片唯一的缺点吧！总之，此片能拍成这样，真的已经很不错了，至少我还是很认可的哦！（此片居然联动了“魔方大厦”！想想当年…唉！永远的遗憾啊！）（五个小人，各有所长，勇闯巨大的校园…不错）
太好玩了，电影院里旁边的孩子哭的稀里哗啦，被她带哭了
怎么说呢，只能说，至少比《李雷和韩梅梅》要好，但也仅限于此了，皮皮鲁的戏份太少了。鲁西西是不是加钱了？
站在孩子的角度，我要给《皮皮鲁与鲁西西之罐头小人》（中国/2021/于飞）五星好评，因为中国的孩子太需要属于自己的电影了。更何况郑渊洁的童话，一向是站在孩子的角度，鼓励个性，批判他们所面对的现实。
儿童电影，还不错。某些镜头小人还是蛮有绿幕感的，感觉小人用动画呈现会不会好点？
保持童真很重要，这部片其实大人带着孩子看比较好，时间定在1985年，片中保留了复古元素，也有当前时尚漂亮的校服，当年确实都特别看重学习成绩，忽视孩子们的兴趣爱好，片中传递的价值观很明确，就是应试教育和素质教育的对立统一，老师和学生的关系，家长和孩子的关系都有很明显的印证，所以这部看似童话故事的儿童片他还是适合家长老师孩子一起看看的，但是我们当年教育的缺陷，执行好双减政策，都有一定的启发，保持童真的心很重要，勇于去探索未知世界。
一群小孩的另类朋友、成年后大人心中的理想主义者对填鸭式教育的反思，郑渊洁的作品看得不多，更关注他是他在抖音上的回复，印象最深的一条是：有个小朋友说郑爷爷，我发现我越来越不喜欢这个世界了怎么办？郑渊洁：恭喜你，世界就是被不喜欢它的人改变的。
读郑渊洁是遥远的往事，我的预期存在偏差，影片有关抗争，但并无过激之处。显而易见的缺点是特效不够逼真，小演员们时有露拙的发挥，以及结尾高潮戏较为刻意。但这些落到一部诚挚的、真正的儿童片上，就会像其他评论者说的——为影片添上些古典趣味。影片整体品质尚佳，配乐出乎意料很好，还有国产少儿版“天才枪手”段落！如今的我得以跳出被刻画者的身份，一身轻松地观看它，也观察其他亲子观众，感受心底既熟悉又陌生的暗流。最后，期待《魔方大厦》。
本来很期待，一部上7分的儿童片，还是不容易。但最后发现说教味道太重，现在再不好好学习，以后实现阶级跨越就越来越难，毒鸡汤。
我打六分，及格了。
比较初代的绿幕技术，确认看的时候小人和“大人”在一幕的时候，甚至是小人单独的场面比较失望吧……即使有些技术不好运用……用道具去实现一些小人单独在的场景，我觉得也算是比较有诚意吧，比直接把小人P上更像一部电影。对内容到没啥可说的，只是我觉得老师前后的转变有些硬，既然注定让老师当个反派，中间一点铺垫没有（也许教导主任开除鲁西西的时候有个触动的镜头），最后成了都是我的孩子……感觉铺垫的不太够吧……说实话，全片除了“王老师”一个算知名演员，其他的连个三线演员都算不上……加上大部分场景连道具都没做，直接就绿幕抠图了，感觉制作费用应该不高……五六千万的票房希望是系列电影还不错的开头吧
制作很一般，表演也过于用力，大人里就王启年还算自然，小孩里那个粉发卡行使程序正义时瞟过一眼，非常有马尔福的神韵。剧情基本保留了，刻意营造了八十年代气氛，特效也像八十年代的。五个小人的造型用的第一版鲁西西那本书里插画的设计，有点怀念。
片子传递的信息挺对的，最后电影院前排一个孩子看得哭得稀里哗啦的。没怎么看过儿童片，四星吧
算是怀旧吧。值得鼓励，现在已经没有真人演的儿童片了。
7分吧，挺低幼的电影，也不算很精良，但我竟然还是看哭了。
伴随整个童年的小说就这么拍出来了…拍摄水平是真的差，几个罐头小人演的也尬，一股网大的即视感。工业水平不行的情况下，童话书可能还是适合拍成动画片。郑渊洁也可以搞个魔方宇宙！
小学可以开除学生吗，小学还有什么保送重点中学？九年制义务教育不都是按学区来的吗？小孩让五个小人先回家，他们怎么回去？回去得多久？能活着到家吗？为了推进剧情最后还来个学校火灾也太狗血了吧。不过我那个上三年级的儿子很喜欢看。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
