Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
男主角每次唱歌我都在吐血，这不是LA La Land那种伪歌舞片，好歹也是大美利坚国粹吧。专业活太业余就算了，这对男女化学反应也为零。但老斯的镜头调度和舞者们的表现都是行业标杆，被两粒老鼠屎给…
中途离场了 因为我老了 受不了天真派和大口音
为什么要翻拍……演技贼棒的唱功在井底 唱功非人类的没演技
故事比原版合理了很多，调度也做了现代化的"升级"，从电影角度来说，它还是有很大进步的，让故事发生的空间更合理了，更自然了。结尾是弱于原版的，甚至有点草草收场的感觉。老斯的摄影调度太赞了，我觉得我再看一遍还是能被里面的歌舞段落所折服，比如开战前的平行剪辑段落等等。
C / 怪异的观感，夹杂在怀念式的做旧，音乐剧式的演绎，cinema化的作者表达中顾此失彼，陈旧剧情的直接搬演显的不合时宜且情感断裂，而精彩的调度和光影又在节奏的孔隙插入了某些迷人时刻。
为什么要拍这个版本啊？因为前几年音乐剧开始火爆了？斯皮尔伯格在末尾写的for dad？？？
剧本的基本结构没动，只是增加了一点文戏，丰富了人物背景，为了适应电影，老版更舞台风，虽然时长没变，但新版感觉更紧凑，叙事节奏更好。故事还是那个罗密欧与朱丽叶的故事，完全看不懂的爱情和莫名其妙死掉的人，这一点不管哪版都一样的蠢。歌曲顺序恢复到基本和音乐剧里相同，感觉更加合理顺畅，老版里改掉的歌词都还原了，这么多年依然好听。新版我最爱的就是歌舞部分，America本来就是我最喜欢的一首歌，这次的编舞更是观赏度爆表，几场大型歌舞戏都是大师级的场面调度，剪辑也好，最后出来的效果就非常有感染力。最爱的三个演员，Mike Faist，Ariana DeBose和David Alvarez都演技歌舞俱佳，Rachel Zegler胜在歌唱得好，Ansel Elgort就是演技歌舞稀烂到全方位被所有人吊打。
总有一种歌舞和剧情撕裂之感，男女主角的存在感接近可有可无
也不知道为啥，这几年看不进去这种爱情片了。看的时候一直在想，这要是昆明“西山区故事”，西山区马街两个街溜子帮派相互不对付，帮派里有男女相爱，但帮派成员互砍出了人命，我会感动吗？恐怕社会新闻出现的时候，我都不会多看一眼，更不可能感动。不能因为这帮老外会唱歌跳舞就不一样吧？马街的街溜子搞不好还会唱山歌跳花灯呢。思来想去，可能主要原因还是男女主没有打动到我。当然了，最后男主背后中枪，却没有扭头看身后，而是径直奔向女主那一小段，还是有感动到我。
非要拍老套故事能不能按老式标准选演员 秃头歪脸粗脖男主怎么撑得起一见钟情的故事 要不把女主改成瞎子？ 女二确实很不错
2022.03.25
纽约曼哈顿西部贫民区里有两伙势不两立的流氓帮派，经常斗殴生事。一次西区舞会上，托尼与玛丽亚一见钟情，但她却是敌对帮派头领的妹妹。
史蒂文·斯皮尔伯格2021年作品，翻拍1961年版，剧情及歌舞走得都有点不伦不类。
必须要说明因为没看过原版的原因以及豆瓣评分过低的原因，导致对这部电影完全没有期待，而结尾又处处超乎我的期待。
最震撼我的是斯皮尔伯格的摄影，影机的运动行云流水，动若脱兔，举重若轻。斯老师很有点得道成仙的味道
既然歌舞片的时代早已落幕就不要勉强把长眠在观众心中的经典刨出来进行一番赶尸了，我好替斯皮尔伯格尴尬啊，刚想吐槽女主角丑，结果被更丑的男主角吓得住了嘴。既然是个歌舞片能不能找两个真实地能歌善舞的人来演啊，这俩是斯皮尔伯格的私生子吗？
难以想象这是斯皮尔伯格的作品，为什么要翻拍百老汇知名音乐剧？无论摄影舞美服装舞蹈灯光音乐都无可挑剔，但这剧本真是要杀人啊，太拧巴，都过去六十年了，为什么不能大刀阔斧改下呢？现在还用这种结局意义大吗？市场会认可吗？
其实评分这么低的原因很好理解，因为这不像电影，更像是一部舞台剧，所以很挑受众。
都说情节太平淡没有波澜起伏，个人觉得这种生活就是平淡的，像温水煮青蛙一样，像不知道何时会开枪的子弹一样。
烂透了。很少给这么大的导演给如此低的分数，但我不理解的是如此陈旧的故事，无趣的转折，没逻辑的感情线，生硬的舞蹈，难听的音乐，为什么还要拍成电影？
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
