Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
很工整的结构，三个故事揭秘人物过去，讲主题“信任”，层层递进。
#2021.123#今年电影好看的是真少…一人一狗一机器
很《辐射》，是新世代语义下的《老人与海》、《鲁滨逊漂流记》，也是汤姆汉克斯全新演绎的《荒岛求生》、《阿甘正传》。机器人的学习曲线很丝滑细腻，细节质感用心。探讨了脆弱渺小的人类，即使脱离了肉体的枷锁，以理论上永生的机器形式存在也难逃孤独的命运。唯一的遗憾是始终没有交待Jeff的能源来源问题。
披着科幻外衣的公路片，核心是信任问题。机器人和狗子都能产生信任，人与人间为什么不可以？正因为是人与人之间，才更难取得信任。信任的前景是柳暗花明，浅显无比的象征能给我们多少安慰？不是耀斑，人终究是自己毁了自己。
他不应该叫Jeff，他应该叫Sheldon。6
不功不过，娓娓道来。实话说没有特别被感动到。汉克斯演技真好，机器人和狗都好萌。
2、《芬奇》可以看做是《荒岛求生》《我，机器人》《火星救援》的结合体，它讲述了一个孤独的工程师带着一只狗狗和一个机器人艰难求生的故事。在本片中，汤姆·汉克斯再一次一个人撑起一部电影，钦佩。
一场旅行，因为有汉克斯大叔在，变的有情有意思。
末世题材玩出新高度，当你不在了，我会带着你的精神走下去直到我灯枯油尽。
4. 科学宅只会只有机器人儿子。
jeff做的非常真实及高科技，但是故事实在太老套，未来版的荒岛余生，特别是蝴蝶，刻意到尴尬
疫情隔离在家看了这部关乎于末日关乎于陪伴的片，坐在戈壁上和狗子抛球玩的情节直接戳爆泪点。关于汤姆汉克斯的电影直接无脑五星就完了
6. 拖延症会错失看世界，必须说走就走的旅行。
很传统经典的技法，但写的真的好啊。还是挺喜欢的。编剧很好的使用了各种技巧，戏剧冲突之外知道如何让观众喜欢。
这是一个关于世界末日无聊的故事，但里面又因为有宠物有些感人。
一想到狗狗走了之后就只有jeff一人了……生物好脆弱但又好强韧。挺感动的，但讲道理，都十五年了！美国这种农业大国地下温室该搞起来了吧？！？！而且公路路况也太好了，无裂缝无杂草甚至连车都没多少……bug过多挺影响到观影的。
近四星。归总只有汤姆汉克斯一个演员啊，所以钱都让汤姆汉克斯自己挣走了。我想要个机器人朋友和一只风神翼龙那样的大机器鸟，那谁还在乎末世啊。
老汤的独角戏，很巧的小品，废土流世界观，有人工智能、机器人，但没有很深的探讨，平平淡淡，无甚回味。
我们都终将老去，唯一可以留给孩子的是教予一生的经验，和经历的故事。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
