A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
散了吧，第一部的红利吃完了。从第一部惊艳的商业制作沦为导演的疯狂意淫，导演才是 King，都是你的男人！
小孩子过家家式的剧本，脑洞大开到没有逻辑。故弄玄虚的历史调侃就像是幼儿园的吵架现场。
连007这种系列都几小心触碰的政治题材
黑翻了，连芬兰车站下车的伟人都一起黑了，不过，最惨的是Woodrow Wilson，尽然因为看Stripper跳舞就不敢参战，还能再黑一点么？！
刚觉得王牌特工系列在节奏上越来越好莱坞化，就来个慢节奏的回归英伦节奏。对历史感兴趣的可能看得出点恶搞历史的乐趣，不然会觉得源起大段父子情谊跟原作的特工快打有较大差异。
搞完一战，再搞二战…?…
4.4 态度很明确，在历史的胶片前嬉闹，可对于主角与反派乃至宏观世界的塑造未免也太不痛不痒了点，通过无意义的死亡来描绘人物是典型的无能表现，动作戏也大都笨拙的不像话，编导和演员一样有心无力。
俄国和最后悬崖段落的打斗着实有不少出彩的地方，但整体剧情也太多想当然，反转颇多，虽有一些铺垫，但观感也免不了部分稍显强行
我对前半段的剧情一点问题都没有，甚至可以打出4星的评价。从将列宁作为牧羊人的手下之后，一切就不那么好看了，后半段也确实开始崩了。我不介意拿历史开玩笑，但这部电影中的玩笑没有任何意义，摸黑列宁不是没有，但是手法很高级，像红警中的尤里就是对于列宁的模仿，虽然我们知道那是列宁，我们打的也是列宁，但是能看出来游戏想要借尤里反应的东西是完全不一样的，而不是这种低俗的娱乐 。最后还将阿道夫和 列宁联系在一起，整个世界大局都是一场牧羊人手下的一盘棋，一场好大的阴谋论，这样的阴谋论下，就是为了突出金士曼的强悍以及特立独行。救世主般的形象生硬地出现在眼前。所以演员很好，但下次别拍了。
大大的预告骗 看预告以为Conrad是男主 结果过完三分之二就这么没了 但联想王男1一开始Harry对Eggsy在Kingsman说的那些话也算是填了伏笔吧（还有海报的C位？……前面的蛋糕戏太草了 马修沃恩你拿什么还我眼睛和耳朵🤯拉叔那个声音omg子 这部麦麸麦那么明显 马修沃恩也是很懂财富密码 这片也不是不好看 但无聊程度跟王男2有点一拼
如果不是拉叔绝对不会浪费两小时看这种烂片的…
这神角色爆笑爆抢眼！
没有爆头烟花好看啊，只有妖僧跳舞打斗还算精彩，还以为帅哥儿子是将来脸叔的角色，悬念留的莫名其妙，就感觉反派派出一个又一个的牛逼手下但被更牛逼的主角一一干掉，最后把大boss干掉，这么俗烂的剧情居然还发生在王牌特工里
情节很无聊，还让我猜错了主角，片子感官优雅俏皮~~
拍的些啥，唯一能看的就是俄国妖僧跳芭蕾暴揍主角父子那段
娱乐干嘛上纲上线跟历史较真。。虽然跟别的电影一样全是槽点，但是剧情还挺意外的。
年轻康纳所迷恋的战争热血与军士荣耀，
好难看，根本没有第一部的神韵，但主创丝毫没有意识到这回事，越走越偏。仿佛编剧一边喝的宁酊大醉，一边写剧本，开心的沉浸在自己的世界里洋洋得意。
这真不是磕多了搞出来的剧本？？？炸烟花不够过瘾，毁自己才够刺激是吗
这个系列做到这一部，基本也就到头了吧。这么好的一个新故事，才第三部就垮成这样了。不仅第一部所有的优点都没能延续，而且不尊重历史胡编瞎改侮辱观众智商。一个怎么拦都拦不住的非要死在一线的贵公子，一个暗地里推动欧洲风云却喜欢住在鸟不拉屎的山顶的大人物，还有一个凭一己之力力挽狂澜后建立王牌特工的头发越来越少却依旧很帅的男人，都不如舔腿的俄罗斯妖僧有意思。可见，这部电影是真没什么看点。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
