This was the first of the videos that started a trend of sex education videos in the early 1990s . I guess the idea behind it was for liberated women to go into a high street store and buy it without any type of guilt or inhibition , but no doubt the main buyer market was teenage boys and dirty old men
THE LOVERS GUIDE is groundbreaking in the fact that it publicised that the couples involved were real life partners but this is slightly dishonest , yes the main couple featured Wendy and her husband were indeed a real life couple who'd been married several years but there was some public controversy that at least one of the couples Kathryn ( The gorgeous brunette ) and Marino ( The well buffed geezer with a ponytail ) had never met one another until they appeared on set where they had unprotected sex for the camera . For a video that self righteously dedicates segments to safe sex it is rather hypocritical
Seeing as it's for education purposes and not pornography as such there's limits as to what can be shown but as a sex education video it's not uninformative though I doubt if you'll be gasping " I never knew that "
As a footnote the main couple featured became something of sexual problem agony aunts in the British press - Until it was revealed that Wendy's husband had a serious heart condition which put a stop to sex . I almost felt sorry for this couple who confessed that they used to make love as often as ten times a day but now couldn't make love once a day because it was too dangerous . My small amount of sympathy soon vanished when shortly afterwards the couple split up and raced off to the gutter press in order to dish the dirt on one another to the highest bidder .
硬是要升华一下，一直在等reflection怎么用出花但是木有；感觉拍的还行但故事不完整也很无聊
真的很浪费，Candyman这类故事最大的潜力在于5这个次数，你永远不知道最后一声会由谁在什么时候喊出来。未知，突然，精确。
不看解读根本不知道讲啥，那些评论说是种族问题，是怎么看出来的？
环球+米高梅两大公司联合出品，电影史上少有！如此看中的题材，还是种族歧视。糖果人是受压迫的黑人的缩影。
不太行，特效不错，恐怖片与种族歧视的噱头融合得很生硬。
故事和隐喻结合得不伦不类的，好好搞好一方面这部电影也不会太差，白浪费了这么精致的摄影和一些创意了。
Who can take the sunrise,Sprinkle it with dew?
一部黑人血泪史 糖果人和隐形人设定相像 都是你看不见 但危险就在那里 观众比角色更能感知危险从而加重了惊悚 以及通过媒介在剧情设定和摄影上玩花样（镜子-任何反射的东西/衣服-任何能覆盖或沾染的东西）
万万没想到最后整出个糖果侠，不是恐怖片么....
艺术审美非常惊人的恐怖片，创作上延续乔丹·皮尔《我们》的思维，新导演在色彩运用和摄影构图方面让影片完全区别于系列前作以及传统的幽灵虐杀片，血浆不少，但是血腥场面却又处理得很克制，很喜欢厕所那场，放在今年都能说是名场面。
确实不怎么样……女主长得很像那个近年很火的好莱坞女星anya
Who can take the sunrise,Sprinkle it with dew?
49 恐怖片不恐怖 想借此来讨论社会问题也并没有多好的效果 反而形成了司马昭之心路人皆知的模样 看得我尴尬到脚趾抓地 整部影片不三不四的像个笑话 作为周末爆米花电影都无聊到让人昏昏欲睡的程度
很多杀人场景的运镜都非常有意思，让人印象深刻，但实打实恐怖的桥段其实到不是特别多。没看过老版，我是看别人解析才知道这是暗含了种族议题。
一旦理解创作者的诉求，这部片会更易懂和体会。
没太处理好尺度，虽然看起来糖果人这个意象的背景在这部片子里被扩充和具象化了（92版是一个case，这版是诸多case的受害人集合体），但是实际意义和功能却被窄化了和偏移了。而且，要么就隐晦巧妙，要么就赤裸直白，这样子恨不得把寓意怼到脸前但是又死活不点名不说破的操作反而有些莫名地凹姿态。夸一夸好的地方，运镜极好，剪纸和镜子的使用非常精妙，片尾交代真实历史案件的设计神来之笔。
糖果人，糖果人，糖果人，糖果人，糖果人不杀黑人。他是黑人群体的生存咒怨。
糖果人是一个蜂巢，住着无数死去的冤魂。
1992版的优点没学会，缺点倒是全部继承了。
generational trauma这种事，也不是一时半会能讲完的，还是多讲讲吧，热了是好事。主角Anthony的形象还是塑造得弱了点，那个被女友扶不上墙又想要一口气的劲儿老感觉还差那么一点儿。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
