常识转换app本子 高清

评分:
9.0 推荐

分类: 记录片 2000

导演: Simon Ludgate

剧情介绍

  This was the first of the videos that started a trend of sex education videos in the early 1990s . I guess the idea behind it was for liberated women to go into a high street store and buy it without any type of guilt or inhibition , but no doubt the main buyer market was teenage boys and dirty old men
  THE LOVERS GUIDE is groundbreaking in the fact that it publicised that the couples involved were real life partners but this is slightly dishonest , yes the main couple featured Wendy and her husband were indeed a real life couple who'd been married several years but there was some public controversy that at least one of the couples Kathryn ( The gorgeous brunette ) and Marino ( The well buffed geezer with a ponytail ) had never met one another until they appeared on set where they had unprotected sex for the camera . For a video that self righteously dedicates segments to safe sex it is rather hypocritical
  Seeing as it's for education purposes and not pornography as such there's limits as to what can be shown but as a sex education video it's not uninformative though I doubt if you'll be gasping " I never knew that "
  As a footnote the main couple featured became something of sexual problem agony aunts in the British press - Until it was revealed that Wendy's husband had a serious heart condition which put a stop to sex . I almost felt sorry for this couple who confessed that they used to make love as often as ten times a day but now couldn't make love once a day because it was too dangerous . My small amount of sympathy soon vanished when shortly afterwards the couple split up and raced off to the gutter press in order to dish the dirt on one another to the highest bidder .

评论:

  • 明好洁 1小时前 :

    我希望我们也有拍这种电影的机会

  • 彩婷 5小时前 :

    比南山的的部长们少了冷峻,多了和睦温馨。艺术性地金大中和背后的竞选军师严昌禄在70年代并肩作战最后又形同陌路的故事,二元对立的手段目的之争一直伴随着两位主角的人物形象和剧情走向。不过故事是非常理想化的,我想导演更想突出的应该是严,首尾呼应偷鸡蛋也是对正完美的织就他的人物个性。另外薛耿求和李善均穿着古典正装四目相对畅谈拥抱真是太有CP感了。

  • 彩栀 9小时前 :

    按照电影中的主题,我们能不能用以牙还牙,以眼还眼的招数去还击?如果用了同样的方法,那么是否背离了自己的初衷?这是一个很让人值得深思的问题。

  • 庚天蓉 2小时前 :

    你如何对付每天来偷你鸡蛋的人?

  • 嘉翱 8小时前 :

    另付:电影不要一味追新求快,天知道你会遇到什么不靠谱的字幕组,把朴正熙翻译成朴槿惠的时候我裤子都湿了[微笑]

  • 乙舒扬 4小时前 :

    卑鄙是卑鄙者的通行证,高尚是高尚者的墓志铭。不过一个只会喊口号,默许影子不择手段的人,还算是高尚者吗?

  • 师梦桃 1小时前 :

    看此类型的片已经看麻了…不过真的要感谢金大中,让我们能看到很多好看的电影。

  • 操雅柔 7小时前 :

    评价相对不高受众群体也小,两点想写。一是这部电影对国内的观众来说,缺乏相应的政治环境帮助我们理解,我们只能以一个外人的身份去看懂情节,而不是理解。二是缺乏强烈的、戏剧性的转折点抓取观众的兴奋点,也就是说看起来比较平淡,人名又多稍不仔细就看的头晕。最有意思的要数影子来回把李韩尚耍着玩那一段。

  • 哈若蕊 8小时前 :

    依然是躲不过cliche的无聊政治小品

  • 扬尔白 6小时前 :

    民主不能依靠个别人的良心,要争取,争取,还是TMD争取

  • 卫家深 5小时前 :

    演技不错,可惜故事题材和背景很不感兴趣,看不下去

  • 卫冠宇 7小时前 :

    韩国每年必出一部描写政治的影片。这部影片让我们知道了在六七十年代那个政治黑暗中,还是有许多人在为了自己的理想再努力,尽管有时候无能为力?

  • 慧枫 4小时前 :

    故事完整而紧凑,导演的运镜非常讲究,光线明暗教科书级别的调度。双男主的对手戏拳拳到肉,薛景求内敛而又有力的表演,李善均也并不逊色,韩国的政治片真是世界顶级水平。

  • 卫宽煌 7小时前 :

    真理往往掌握在少部分人手里,所以广泛的大众永远是盲目的

  • 双皓轩 0小时前 :

    高丽国政治类型片的标准产品,一切都合乎标准,经典款。

  • 乐子默 9小时前 :

    不择手段的军师和追求大义的领导,最后有点金大中的影子,在韩影政治题材里感觉一般

  • 宗政冷菱 9小时前 :

    谎言,栽赃,贿选,舞弊,拉帮结派,挑动对立,几乎展示了韩国选举的种种弊病,可相比本片铺陈了一出精彩的纸牌屋大戏,更中意对推动韩国民主化进程群像的塑造。

  • 亥静涵 3小时前 :

    “一个政客乱扔垃圾的国家不过是一个厕所”/ “他们的酒在木浦下雨 他们的盛宴创造了山”/ “光线越强 阴影就越暗 但我喜欢在光照下看到你”

  • 廖清妍 1小时前 :

    看完感觉金挺装的,又当又立,个人真的很反感口口声声把民主挂嘴边的人员,仿佛一个吟诵法师。

  • 嘉翱 5小时前 :

    对付君子有君子的办法,对付小人就只能用诡计。国民是盲目的,只要是对的,最终的胜利者采用的过程手段都是有阴暗的一面。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved