Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
感动来自于 对 个人 集体 国家 民族 的触碰和整理
什么时候中国才能拍出具有史诗感的战争片啊
相比第一部这部显得更独立简单，看完之后总感觉少点什么，有些画面过于血腥并不适合低龄儿童。
希望如果有下一部，导演编剧还是多抓抓剧情故事线吧
如果不较真思考……boomboomboom效果蛮好的
因为当年的那些付出，才有今天的幸福生活，可是他们望着故乡的方向，却再也回不来了。
太惨烈了，太惨烈了！看的很难受，大场面特效拍的都不错，就是现在看不得太悲的电影，心情久久平复不了。
这两年抗美援朝电影也太多了一些吧！
能激发各位深沉强烈的爱国情感，
就该多拍主旋律电影，就该多多文化输出，强烈支持！
进攻的时候，那个配乐太过吵闹，容易造成有主角光辉的猜想……
完整度比第一部高很多 徐克把电影创作成英雄主义精神 文戏和武戏之间也更加顺畅 但故事依然讲的太长了 毕竟动机和矛盾并不多 没有必要在三的在双方阵营中切换 不过最后的收尾依然悲壮惨烈气壮山河 但在电影语言中 不是只有滚动字幕这一种苍白无趣的表达 饱满的情绪和镜头已经把一切推向了高潮
伍万里拿到旗帜的那一刻，才有些明白军人的荣耀是多么沉。
这个桥为什么这么重要最后看的还是莫名其妙。易烊千玺的幸存也是莫名其妙。
讲好中国故事，不一定都得是红色电影，我们坐拥5000年的文明和历史，有太多好故事可讲。近些年某些导演通过红色电影想必是赚得盆满钵满，确实，这种电影唤起了很多观影者的感触：先烈为建设强大的新中国，洒热血断头颅，我确实感激这一群人的伟大，没有他们就没有我今天的食饱衣暖。但是，这些电影真的是那么完全客观么？当然可能也是我的愚见，我觉得很多时候这些反日反美斗争的电影也唤醒了一些人畸形的反外情绪。这样除了涂有一腔热血之外，好像没啥收获，获得不了什么营养。真的希望这些导演赚够了红色电影的钱，能够精选一些中华优秀传统文化的题材翻牌成电影，一方面能够为国家优秀的底蕴而自豪，还能拯救一下逐渐在中华民族历史长河中消散的珍宝，让人们大有裨益。（只希望大家求同存异，个人观点，不喜勿喷，谢谢！）
三炸水门桥，后来还是让美军逃跑了，好可惜！看着让人心疼。
致敬，中国人民志愿军。
这种电影虽说不算太拉，但终究还是不会太好。
特效和制作可以 除了四字弟弟全员be很感人 但缺少故事线
场面做的好，作为电影是合格的，虽然与战史上的三炸水门桥有区别，而并没有展现冰雕连……
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
