王加玉 高清

评分:
9.0 推荐

分类: 欧美综艺 1998

导演: Harvey Lilley

剧情介绍

  Exploring the role and symbolic meaning of the Crown Jewels in the centuries-old coronation ceremony, The Coronation shows these objects of astonishing beauty in new high-resolution footage. The film tells the extraordinary story of St Edward's Crown, which was destroyed after the English Civil War and remade for the Coronation of Charles II in 1661. It has only been worn by Her Majesty once, at the moment she was crowned.
  On 2 June 1953, on one of the coldest June days of the century and after 16 months of planning, The Queen set out from Buckingham Palace to be crowned at Westminster Abbey, watched by millions of people throughout the world. A ceremony dating back more than a thousand years was to mark the dawn of a new Elizabethan age.
  Viewing both private and official film footage, The Queen recalls the day when the weight of both St Edward's Crown and the hopes and expectations of a country recovering from war were on her shoulders, as the nation looked to their 27 year-old Queen to lead them into a new era.
  In the film, The Queen says: 「I've seen one Coronation, and been the recipient in the other, which is pretty remarkable.」
  For audiences unfamiliar with the story of the Crown Jewels and the regalia, the film explains their contemporary relevance to the UK as a nation and to the enduring purpose and the work of monarchy. They are symbols of the relationship between the Sovereign and the people, and the duties and responsibilities of leadership.
  The film also features eyewitness accounts of those who participated in the 1953 Coronation, including a maid of honour who nearly fainted in the Abbey, and a 12 year-old choirboy who was left to sing solo when his overwhelmed colleagues lost their voices.

评论:

  • 怡格 1小时前 :

    在我心里,没有一部电影可以拍好朝鲜战争。电影一方面太浓墨重彩,一方面又太过苍白,不论如何都很难重现70年前那些轻描淡写又重如泰山的牺牲。看到某些场面可能想说太夸张啦!但曾经有比这更夸张的;有些场面想说太单调了,但现实比这些还要苍白。但不管怎么说,都还是庆幸有这些描写朝鲜战争的片子,至少他们可以提醒一代又一代的中华儿女铭记这段艰难的时光。

  • 单毅然 3小时前 :

    三星给历史。场面特效都有了,却唯独忽略了故事本身,群戏刻画和人物塑造被隔壁吊打。PS:将近2个半小时也太长了,一度想快进。

  • 何飞鸣 4小时前 :

    不错!余从戎为掩护队友为敌机活活烧死那一段真的很震撼。致敬

  • 寿鹏鹍 8小时前 :

    如果两部电影删去尴尬与槽点剪成一部时长长些的片或许会好很多

  • 伯颖秀 8小时前 :

    看得非常心疼,知道结局的情况下,看着志愿军门英勇向前冲,更是难受。珍惜现在的生活,居安思危,这么多年来,美国还是我们的对手!

  • 岚桐 3小时前 :

    电影惨烈 电影背后的历史更惨烈

  • 夹谷红旭 8小时前 :

    7.5分吧、场面宏大、技术方面过关、几个s亡场景的慢动作也不会显得特别假、这个特效武器场面一看就比长津湖进步了不少,情节也比长津湖丰富了一些,没有将美军刻画成无脑敌人,那个一直在水泵房躲着的漂亮国军人也是很行,最后那句第七穿插连,应到157人实到1人pdf了,不过说这话的四字表情有点怪,说不上来,可能是想演倔强?反正他的电影电视剧最好的演技还是笨小孩…还需要努力不过也是比很多人好多了…整部电影好心疼梅生的眼睛,呜呜呜

  • 巫忆彤 5小时前 :

    第七穿插连应到一百五十七人,实到一人!

  • 乔合瑞 7小时前 :

    而是懂得了面对战争

  • 嬴奇文 6小时前 :

    相比同期的狙击手 仿佛没有了个体的情感与内心变化 只有群像式的宏伟与悲壮 大场面的视效看多了总会让人生厌 落得到最后也不过就是总该如此的不痛不痒

  • 业念雁 0小时前 :

    2022年第一部过审的电影。虽然有预期,但还是感动落泪了。很多画面很有徐老怪特有的魔幻感,只是故事细节上偶尔会缺逻辑。

  • 恒振 4小时前 :

    纵观全片,好像只有朱亚文有一点战争之外的故事。如果其他人也可以表现一点他们身为“人”的故事,应该能让人物更立体一点。

  • 云洲 5小时前 :

    3.5

  • 文诗蕊 5小时前 :

    场面做的好,作为电影是合格的,虽然与战史上的三炸水门桥有区别,而并没有展现冰雕连……

  • 卫茜 9小时前 :

    就该多拍主旋律电影,就该多多文化输出,强烈支持!

  • 及俊风 4小时前 :

    两个字:燃,炸!

  • 巴运珹 3小时前 :

    整体剧情很连贯,视听效果有所提高,也许是出于各种原因,国外演员选择太仓促,那些军官们演技实在是三流水平……

  • 墨宏阔 8小时前 :

    有几处确实有戳到泪点,战争片必然的。

  • 井慧丽 9小时前 :

    岁月仍未安好,吾辈当自强。

  • 彤沛 1小时前 :

    镜头画面绝了,好多血腥的场面,先辈不易!!

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved