Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
6分，欢乐的爱情喜剧，剧情基本没啥新意，看个热闹就完了，男主真帅
这片子唯一的作用就是为我科普了不同颜色的蓝色衬衫。
俗套爱情剧，俗但是喜欢，just like comfort food
到中段都表现不错 但是后面的misunderstanding实在是太cliché了
本来是两分的 然而男主弯腰抱女主的时候我该死的心动了
看片名以为会是个决胜21点的故事，实际上还是保罗·施拉德《第一东正会》那种受困过往回忆的主角渴望救赎的路子，所以突破性不太大，赌博在这里不过是暂时逃避痛苦的手段，同时也指代了男主未知的命运，关塔那摩监狱那段的鱼眼变形镜头还挺妙，荒唐与扭曲被呈现了出来，整体还是很克制，有种苦行僧的感觉，伊萨克花白头发造型好评。
3.5。片子细碎而冗长，弥漫着一种萧索的氛围，一如主角的心境。还以为是讲述一个天才的赌片，没想到最后是一个人的赎罪之旅。这种独立电影的气质略显沉闷却又莫名的引人入胜。大反派居然是威廉达福？
职场浪漫爱情喜剧，两个人互相斗气的时候真的十分小学生，选角太好了
虽说各种人设情节走向都是能想到的设定，不过整体看下来还是比较轻松有意思的小甜片的，适合拿来放松身心
美国电影里人家开车都是开路开路偶尔看一眼副驾的美女
听说甜度爆表/正能量takeaway：在事业上很有冲劲闪闪发光的女生惹人爱/现实：首先你对面得坐一个帅哥
6+，常规跨年爱情喜剧，属于看片名知结局的那种。放松看，别较真。
The body never forgets. 审讯的痛感在想象中无限放大，白色的布包裹着家具，等着暴力和悔恨。
“一天天不好好工作在本子上画叉叉（ modern Darcy”
摄影机与Tell之间只保持着一种方向的运动：向他贴近。从而从此刻离开，逼退回某个恒定的原点，类型范式自然也便成了仅供演进的空壳。
总的来说，就是没什么卵的说服力，爱情片儿没说服力就很假啦，看看家居布置和穿搭尚可。
就想问 why... 很久没看对话如此尴尬的片了
这么cliche的东西如果拍成限制级会多一星吧，365总裁爱上我虽然烂但是至少让人记住了男主苏感，这部也就只能过目忘了吧…
先看小说的人感觉和想象有所出入，女主不是我心中想的哈哈。两个人没有那么来电吧
这本书告诉我们，阶级不同的人，就别一头栽进去了，决对没有好下场。别说是夫妻爱人了，就连做朋友都难。阶级不同注定了，价值观，消费观各种观都不和，最初的激情消耗完了，还剩下什么，只能是各执己见的争吵了！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
