-
视频
视频
资讯
视频
资讯
Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
如果两个人出了问题这么解决能重归于好的话我也愿意。
真的是「婊子配狗，天长地久」。有昆汀混合着盖里奇+大卫芬奇那个味了。导演够变态，血浆不要钱似的用。阁楼大便、舔脚爆菊、台球塞肛、猎枪爆头等劲爆菜码也是接连奉上，几乎应接不暇。开篇夫妻互损的戏码对台词的功底要求极高，对此编剧同样功不可没。电影的节奏非常紧凑，结构、串联、转场、配乐都很出众，矛盾此起彼伏又妙趣横生。它一上线我就第一时间下到硬盘里，犹豫三周却只因为简介里的惊悚二字迟迟未看（其实哪有什么惊悚啊），结果它居然在《一周口碑电影榜》连续霸榜三周，险些错过。精彩精彩。4.5星。
Predictable like fuck.
算还不错的爽片，剧本不错，但我实在没耐心看其中絮絮叨叨的对话。
7.3分，hhhhhhh，不愧是死亡之雪的导演，血浆跟不要钱一样满天飞，反转的又多又绝，hhhhhhh，太好笑了，没什么烧脑戏份，但是看着不费脑又爽又好笑，适合放松心情的时候看
会议室影院第七部，喜欢这种loser情侣相爱相杀的爱情故事😊
特别特别楞和二的那种，所有角色的人设都属于不聪明的蠢一类，很多地方也都是很憨的bug，但是很低级的血腥暴力和幽默让人看得既解压又大笑。嘲讽人性的低俗和卑劣，谁也不比谁高级，谁也不比谁演技好，每个人都用烂演技在经营看似美好的人生。
超级cut，奈飞和挪威电影的完美结合。剧本好，演技棒。看来风景并不是好莱坞独好。期待奈飞盘活香港电影！
且不说剧情多离谱，这是今年最容易被遗落的动作喜剧婚姻片。从开始男主往光头上摸护手霜开始，我就知道这片子一定笑飞了，有一幕脑浆借位在女主头上喷出去很精巧，整体节奏气氛也掌握得刚好，大部分时间不让人分神已经很棒了。
哈哈哈哈。没有爱情的婚姻。互相计划暗杀对方。
3星，重口味惊悚喜剧片，情节有些俗套，节奏有点慢。看看不错。
猛又爽，还巨搞笑。暴力美学×北欧幽默，和诸多前后呼应的细节一起，糅合得太好了。
该死的长发蠢货 投给绿党的白痴
消遣看还可，如果是美国拍的可能会更吸引人一点。虽然是题材很好的悬疑电影，但开局意境完全没有塑造出来。
【C】唯一的亮点是最后吐槽好莱坞选角强行黑人的那段确实有笑到，但电影的完成度依然很低，剧本粗糙缺乏打磨，角色非常很扁平而且情绪变化很生硬很奇怪。这些其实都还好，最让人受不了的地方就是打晕了拿刀的绑匪后刀就在旁边主角居然不捡起刀来补刀？一次就算了，后来把拿枪的绑匪打死后枪就在旁边，居然不拿枪？？诸如此类无法理解的地方还有很多，看的有点难以忍受。
7.5分虚高了，搞笑+反转+血浆，值得一看，但不值得反复看，所以6分足
丈夫的一句“哥伦比亚大学打来的”
小制作做成这样已经算精彩了。
7.2/10，这片太硬核了，血浆笑料齐飞。
對這種靠巧合爆漿堆砌出的所謂「爽片」已無感，有趣的大概只有幾處揶揄嘲諷政治正確的地方。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
