Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
让人想起卡尔维诺写的：你走了那么远的路，只是为了摆脱怀旧的重负。
基调是感伤的，然而赵婷的镜头施加给弗恩的不是“磨难”而是“浪漫”，这估计也是赵婷与凯莉•雷查德之间的差距。
很喜欢这样的公路片，安静而不戏剧化，几乎所有的戏剧性都来自真实的生活。麦克多蒙德演这个角色简直不要太有说服力，倔强地永远在路上，在漂泊中渐渐疗愈自己。相信到最后她真正说服了自己，是无房可归，而非无家可归，这种强大的人生前进力量，就是影片的成功所在。
感觉是把留学生常说的“好山好水好寂寞”拍出来了。
8.5/10
金球奖落下帷幕，无依之地成为最大赢家，除了斩获最佳剧情电影，赵婷也获得了最佳导演……在我看，这部电影足以和Charles Chaplin的《Modern Times》比肩，都是在讲经济大萧条之下的人性光辉大爱无言。弗朗西斯-麦克多蒙德和“漂泊者”之间的互助就像Chaplin和孤女，彼此帮扶亲密无间，并且全部都坚信希望之光就在眼前。奥斯卡影后沧桑的面容很富有年代感，她追逐着季节更换工作频繁，与《Modern Times》的Chaplin异曲同工即便相隔近百年！
放逐：
以极度小资的方式呈现无产阶级，和《骑士》一样，所谓“自然主义”的外壳下，包裹的依旧是一个程式化的故事，但这部要矛盾得多。如果真是想要替真正的游牧者发声，那就应该以他们为主角，而不是让他们成为背景，让来体验生活的奥斯卡影后逮着一个就来一段鲁豫有约（唯一与主角发展出浪漫关系的“男主角”也是职业演员）；如果着重的是人物研究，那为何不多把视线从“站点”中挪开片刻，多拍一点“上路”的过程？
完蛋，哎
当然，很容易指摘说赵婷的改编过于浪漫化，但电影本身并不必然承担社会学责任。就其审美层面而言，这一百分钟的大写意，既一言不发，又滔滔不绝，那些痛苦的难堪的窘迫的屈辱的，被省略也被超越。东坡和佛印，肚里有什么，眼里又有什么？
纯正的美国电影，美国现象，白人视角，所以与亚裔何干？与亚洲人何干？与中国人何干？
在社会关怀与个人选择之间，似乎有一条难以兼顾的线。
看得非常舒服的电影，像散文诗一样。来来去去，潮落潮起，自我放逐的旅者恒在路上。你能看到打零工、捉襟见肘的现实，也能看到每一次太阳从苍茫大地上升起的诗意。刻意离群索居，游离于亲密关系之外的女主，你能懂得她的孤独，也会认可她的选择。人性、历史大背景、自然的诗意，以近乎纪录片的松弛结构完美融合，得奖也合情合理。
视角选题立意都很好 很喜欢导演的态度 客观展现事实并尊重个人选择 一直偏好这种有意义的影片 反映现实问题并引人思考 期待导演下一部影片
See you down the road. 这也算是公路片吧，镜头风格好喜欢。孤独并伴随着孤独共生，不停下脚步，至少是我会愿意选择的生活方式。（和我娘一起看的，她看完就完全无感…毕竟只有我这样的性格会恨不得远离固定环境天天在路上
北方一片苍茫。没有之前想象的那般凄凉，也并非纯然“无依”，反而时不时恍惚，似乎自己也存在某种可能进入如此生活轨迹，以前阅读《在路上》，以及在青海教书，在大西北搭车的时光，某些感受，似乎也穿插浮现。其实只要一个轻轻的转身，我们就可能过着完全不同的生活。而他们的在路上，并非无依，而是必须上路。。。ps，最近在读《扫地出门》，pss，父子弹钢琴的画面，太动人。
我并不是喜欢流浪，我只是不配再有一个家。
赵婷真的不一样，她找到了属于自己独特的叙事方式，这种风格让人一瞬间感觉电影贴的现实世界特别近，下一瞬间又感觉电影早已击穿了现实世界，但细细回想两者又有一些暧昧存在，不近不远，她从《骑士》的尝试到现在的锋芒早已站稳了好莱坞，她不学习谁，她不继承谁，她就是她自己。
「當你在穿山越嶺的另一邊 我在孤獨的路上沒有盡頭」
我拥抱更多的记忆，但陪伴我每天的只有那一份，一切看来那么实感的温暖都不是我可以拥有的。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
