Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
如果《这个杀手不太冷静》有龙套逆袭之星途璀璨的梦幻。那么《误杀2》是草根遇到怒火重案，想必只能是大胆刁民，死路一条……没有水花镜月的人世间。
其实要单看的话这一部还行，但要放在《哆啦A梦》这个系列里就比较失败了。和以往对老版的改编方式如出一辙，在剧情的整体框架内进行改动，对比之下有利有弊。原版弱化了巴比和人民大众的作用，新版则加强了不少，这方面是我觉得改动较好的地方；但是新版对原版的诸多改编导致原本的笑点、剧情的合理性、甚至反派的智商都被削弱了不少，而原版对许多经典电影的致敬，在当中所表达对电影的无限热爱，在新版中基本全无，这是我觉得最可惜的地方。不过还能在影院里看到手绘的机器还是很感动的
故事不合理，内涵不深刻。泰国？: ) 有点无奈，有点可爱。
未免太刻意了。有种廉价假珍珠的感觉，努力想要打造高贵的形象，但是珠光是廉价的，细看还掉皮。
二十年前的电影翻拍出来的都是屎。国内娱乐圈侮辱观众，当然上赶着吃屎和吃不出来是屎的人也很多。悲哀。
只想说市长靠关系拿到器官供体这种犯罪程度，比起贪污上亿要轻很多吧，更不用说为了几十万搞出一个豆腐渣工程害人姓名，当然最后也只是想洗白市长，但感觉比第一部差点意思
4.5/10，这种电影时常让我怀疑存在一个我完全无法理解的平行宇宙，而我是不相信平行宇宙的。
片名别叫误杀2 和误杀1没有半毛钱关系
第一部误杀他人，第二部误杀自己，虽然两部改编自不同的故事，但同是以父爱对抗强权的主题。
只剩毫无节制的煽动——一切虚假情绪的成立完全建立在一个全由架空的地域甚至语境中，人物沦为影片内外强力剧作的傀儡，这破片要是又能过10亿的话，大陆院线的观众真是只配看这种廉价的垃圾情绪影像哇。
好家伙，就跟那跑调的唱歌似的，全是感情，没有技巧，
没想到第二部竟然翻拍了和第一部毫无关系的《迫在眉梢》，如此文不对题是真的意外。改编后的插叙剧情并不如原版细腻感人，甚至把原版中音医保不报销改成现在的心源被抢，把本来对于医疗系统的矛盾转化成到个人权力上，低级了不少
改編別人的創作，把故事放在泰國，瘋狂加反轉，兩部誤殺都是笑話。
一般，你知道主角肯定赢的没啥悬念，不过儿童题材能拍反毒菜的剧情也是挺难得的，加一星。
他儿子的心脏和成年人一样大，所以要换，最后换了个成年人的心脏。+1最后文咏珊是要一个人还200万高利贷吗？
看之前没看原版，虽说bug很多，虽说故意煽情，但还算好看，能吸引我一直投入地看完。评分偏低。我给6.3，看完原版再回来改。
一帮华人拿着美国的剧本去东南亚把人家政府给黑的体无完肤……
5、宋洋演技突破不小，可喜可贺；
两星半。这样靠着反转吸引观众的片子，节奏一慢就容易让人失去耐心，至少前一个小时有些太平缓了，后半部分反转一出就应该及时止损，结果还要多拍个结尾扣前面的铺垫，强行升华父爱主题。当然，这招对很多观众来说应该很催泪。调侃女性家暴的情节着实招人烦。
三星我还是愿意给的。这几天在看《谁是凶手》。肖央演技确实在线，因为两个一起看，很明显的看到了肖央演技的区别。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
