Min Ji-suk runs a "ticket bar"where customers can purchase tickets for certain "services"in the town of Sokcho in Gangwon-do. She hires Miss Yang (Ahn So-young), Miss Hong (Lee Hye-young), and Se-young (Jeon Se-young) through the employment agency. Miss Yang and Miss Hong, who are well experienced in this type of business, are used to accepting propositions from customers. But Se-young, who is dating a college student named Min-su, rejects all requests for sexual favors. When Min-su professes to having problems with his tuition and finances, Se-young reassures him that she will procure the necessary funds for him. When the bar's clientele begins to dwindle because of Se-young, Ji-suk reprimands her severely. Se-young develops a close relationship with a Captain Pak and even allows him to sleep with her. She asks Captain Pak to find Min-su employment on a boat, but when Min-su comes to Sokcho for his new job, he sees how Se-young has been making her living. Shocked, he turns his back on the job and leaves. When he eventually returns to Sokcho, he scathingly denounces Se-young's morality and severs their relationship. Decades ago, Ji-suk had stumbled into the bar business in a desperate effort to support her husband, who was serving time in prison; she later left him voluntarily out of shame and moral degradation. Concerned that Se-young will end up with the same fate, Ji-suk asks Min-su to meet with her. She begs him not to abandon Se-young, but he flatly refuses. Ji-suk reacts by pushing Min-su into the sea, and suffers a mental breakdown that lands her in a psychiatric institution.
比tv好不代表就是好片，全员歇斯底里式演技，不知道吼什么，所有人物都是工具人演了一个没必要的故事，还z章，和泽塔有啥关系？强行串联
事情的真相或许我们永远无法得知，但我们可以追寻法律上的真相
差不多就行了，求求了
同时，导演也交代了目前法国的法律和司法制度的环境背景之当代完美现状：陪审团制、无罪推断原则、法律的矫正功能和教育意义以及社会意义、司法独立不受舆论操弄、淡化法律的惩罚意义、关注两位当事人的心理修复和社会修复等。 而，既然是思想实验，剩下的，就交给诸位讨论了。
也就徐峥试着学韦斯安德森算是值得一看，虽未得精髓但趣味有了，别的都是综艺《演员请就位》里拍小短片玩儿的水平，套路，无趣。
今年看到现在，目前的年度第二，仅次于阿彼察邦的记忆。导演和摄影神了，演员更是全线在线，庭审戏可进教科书，水平吊打威尼斯和戛纳主竞赛的水平。
“一个问题的不同解读”毁掉两个年轻人的美好，也许岁月会让他们成熟到父母那样坦然分手各过日子，但斯坦福毕业证和婚前贞洁名声肯定都没了。本片拍得一点都不敷衍，法庭辩论极其精彩，算是在不断推进的两性关系认知中的分析与思考。
沉默被认为是许可，恐惧被认为是顺从，迟滞被认为是享受，遮掩被认为动机叵测……这不是罗生门，而是男性视角和叙事之下的女性处境，尤其加深了男性的精英标签之后，更加讽刺。
反派的理由越来越魔幻了。主角不叫司麦路就好了
「乘风」就像是吴京版的「亮剑」同人，「诗」是「我造火箭的父亲母亲」，精明的徐峥用「鸭先知」“致敬”了一把韦斯·安德森，沈腾再一次证明了在开心麻花眼中电影和小品差别不大。
几个观后感：1，欧洲人真的是人类淫荡和混乱起点和终点。2，有钱人犯法是真能见到排场，把官司时间无限延长直到形势对其有利。还能牵扯尽可能多的有关无关人员，来站队或者来把事情变得越来越复杂，从而没人再关注事情本质。3，法治不可靠，它试图约束人类，但人类总能控制它；道德才是最好的良药。
章子怡那段太好了 质感和收敛的情绪太好了
《诗》中的父母天空写诗，让我想起来了罗贝托·波拉尼奥《美洲纳粹文学》《遥远的星辰》两部小说；情感细腻，叙事稳重，尤其是结尾的那首诗升华主题。
章子怡那一篇看得我哭个不停，小男孩在房间里抖孔明灯那一幕好美
为了徐峥和沈腾打分，沈腾出乎意料的不是很好
鸭先知是矮子里拔将军的第一了 命题作文 一部不如一部啊
补分，章子怡那章至真至美，吴京吴磊那章有点俗套了但是还是打动人心的，徐峥那章空有画面没有内核，沈腾那章太无聊太弱智了
女生与男生到底谁是受害者？
只有徐峥的还有点意思，这个系列越拍越不行了。
罗翔老师详细的说个这个问题。女性表示出不就是不。现实中的问题是，男的可以不承认女性有表示出不。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
