男女性知识图片 高清

评分:
9.0 推荐

分类: 记录片 2010

导演: Simon Ludgate

剧情介绍

  This was the first of the videos that started a trend of sex education videos in the early 1990s . I guess the idea behind it was for liberated women to go into a high street store and buy it without any type of guilt or inhibition , but no doubt the main buyer market was teenage boys and dirty old men
  THE LOVERS GUIDE is groundbreaking in the fact that it publicised that the couples involved were real life partners but this is slightly dishonest , yes the main couple featured Wendy and her husband were indeed a real life couple who'd been married several years but there was some public controversy that at least one of the couples Kathryn ( The gorgeous brunette ) and Marino ( The well buffed geezer with a ponytail ) had never met one another until they appeared on set where they had unprotected sex for the camera . For a video that self righteously dedicates segments to safe sex it is rather hypocritical
  Seeing as it's for education purposes and not pornography as such there's limits as to what can be shown but as a sex education video it's not uninformative though I doubt if you'll be gasping " I never knew that "
  As a footnote the main couple featured became something of sexual problem agony aunts in the British press - Until it was revealed that Wendy's husband had a serious heart condition which put a stop to sex . I almost felt sorry for this couple who confessed that they used to make love as often as ten times a day but now couldn't make love once a day because it was too dangerous . My small amount of sympathy soon vanished when shortly afterwards the couple split up and raced off to the gutter press in order to dish the dirt on one another to the highest bidder .

评论:

  • 籍成荫 9小时前 :

    我全程:哈哈哈哈哈哈…

  • 鹏震 8小时前 :

    拉拉分。这个导演将印度神话、历史与现实结合得一如既往的牛逼。国只是个壳啊,同志们!西部精神才是内核(印度电影史常有的样子)。战狼个毛。

  • 谢嘉惠 9小时前 :

    不算了解这段历史,但是就电影来说,两个低级职员几乎改变历史显得似乎可信度不高,偶然性太大。不算好看。

  • 林玥 5小时前 :

    全片看完不知意义何在。又不是2037年,竟然有人给这个题材投钱。英德两国年轻一代演员真是要颜值没颜值要演技没演技。全靠艾恩斯、迪赫这群爷叔撑着。我就是冲爷叔们来的。迪赫随便演个配角就很抓人。我还串戏串在他的《包豪斯时代》。再说剧情,这是走微观史学之路么?编也编得用点心,在牛津念个德语系,改天两个人就知道了天机,只可惜没有签字权,不然要怎样?不是洗白张伯伦,而是所有决策都是不完全信息下的零和博弈,说白了就是赌博。即使张伯伦当时作出相反的决策,结果也只是战争早一年到来,也许英国也跟法国一样在战争初期就那么投降了。一切马后炮都是耍流氓。

  • 韦运 8小时前 :

    不愧是德国人,不愧是马克思的诞生地😭——哲学家总想着怎么解释世界,而真正重要的是改变世界

  • 栋承悦 5小时前 :

    就着渣画质可下饭的3小时神片,现代印度版武松打虎,RRR!牛牛牛!

  • 浑浩言 6小时前 :

    这部电影最让我感动的是结局,Paul放弃刺杀近在咫尺的希特勒,而Hugh和平谈判归来却决定参军。我们每个人都没有权力做审判者,但是我们每个人都有义务去抗争。

  • 阮曼冬 9小时前 :

    印度电影有他的民族特色,这种电影就是解压,“给人一种前所未有的幸福感”,也就是陈凯歌拍《无极》时追求的效果!从《巴霍巴利》一路看过来,喜欢这个导演very much,期待后作!

  • 糜修德 5小时前 :

    3.5⭐️

  • 郦念露 0小时前 :

    很精致的片子,在真实历史的框架里展示不同人的各种抉择,很精彩

  • 次雅懿 8小时前 :

    “I’ll miss you”, “good bye” “good bye”

  • 贸沛萍 2小时前 :

    1930,夏天,牛津,同窗,分道扬镳,重逢,分享一根烟。就这你问我有没有看出queer subtext?嗯?22年2月底,历史照进现实了。

  • 籍灵阳 4小时前 :

    剧情节奏很慢的电影,又没有很享受的过程,没有看下去的欲望。粗略看解说,简单来说就是失去了阻止二战的一次绝佳机会,但历史不能够重演了,讲这些有多大意义呢?做好当下为和平付出的努力,维护当下世界和平才是正道。

  • 锋家 4小时前 :

    美术和舞蹈设计部分非常出彩,几段转场也很惊艳。看的印度人民一本正经的开挂,确实能给人带来不少乐趣。感谢印度神片给我带来三个小时快乐。

  • 柔玥 7小时前 :

    无功无过,是理解张伯伦的另外一个角度吧,很喜欢男二说的一句话,希望是等待别人行动,只有放弃希望,我们才能做的更好

  • 蒲彦君 5小时前 :

    不愧是德国人,不愧是马克思的诞生地😭——哲学家总想着怎么解释世界,而真正重要的是改变世界

  • 绳嘉熙 8小时前 :

    我再也不说咱们手撕鬼子那样神剧了比起这部片长三小时的宝莱坞巨制史诗电影来说那都浮云。宝莱坞歌舞为我们抒写了可歌可泣的抗英大戏就如《赛德克·巴莱》剧情加歌舞和夸张武打效果真阿三脑洞也领我佩服,升格实在太多了!

  • 邹思山 5小时前 :

    历史题材可能限制不小,故事来说就显得很平,影片好像过了1/3才交代去德国的任务,这样就进入得太慢了啊,但是还算拍得工整,一众卡司不错。

  • 焦雅爱 2小时前 :

    接受了歌舞和夸张的特技动作戏的话……其实还是个不错的爽片……处于CGI技术相当发达的现代拍摄这种抗英神剧,对广大的印度人民来说应该是极致的享受了吧。哈哈

  • 震嘉 6小时前 :

    3个小时有点长,毕竟内容有就是高配版手撕鬼子。印度电影好处是男主都很man不娘,男二比男一有魅力。花时间描写男一和总督家眷的感情是为啥呢,后面莫名其妙就没了。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved