Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
7.5/10.杀手女孩，又辣又酷。女杀手也要打工，也有社恐，日式无厘头，幽默漫画风。两个女主角演的都很好，黄短发女主竟然有点像窦靖童。
前边质感还可以，越到后边越离谱，甚至中间还扯了个偷东西是因为不认同父母为富不仁，我寻思你偷东西咋还偷出正义感了？
很是无聊 平淡 听片名感觉很有意思很是刺激又聪明的一个团队 然后完成一个大爽片 但其实很无聊 平淡
轻松好看，有霓虹斤骨子里那种天真蒙昧的东西在，JK真好啊
我唯一清醒的的时候就是小马两次泼了自己一身咖啡
女主和被平民的英国二王妃好像
只要一个听诊器就能开的保险箱，看不出哪里牛逼了。。。更别说傻不啦叽的反派了
豆瓣上全是电影专家，只因为是扎克施耐德的衍生作品就指指点点。但一部电影只要让我看的开心就是好了。
又臭又长。看完这个，活死人军团在我心中又加了0.1分哈。
时间还可以再长点，三个小时左右最好吧，开锁时再来点破解就更好了
比较完整的一个故事，开锁的戏份有点简单，男女主的爱情戏有点突然，三星。
故事挺老套 已经忘了扎导的后作讲了什么故事 开锁的清洁还算合格 整个团队戏也有点水时长的嫌疑 属于有点自作多情自我感动的故事 爱情戏缺少细节支撑和处理 犯罪的情节却有些小儿科 不过还是比扎导的版本要合格很多 中间很多情节也有严重的拷贝倾向
冗长，interpol的戏份一点必要都么得
所以我还得看完另一部烂片才能前后接合理解 是这意思吗？
全员都好不正常的样子，但是真寻和千里实力演绎了什么叫“可爱又迷人的反派”。虽然反社会，但是有魅力。
还算不错，剧情比较老套简单，好在演员颜值不错，演技在线。最精彩的是保险箱内齿轮转动，层层机关契合而推进的场面，华丽流畅，比起剧情更加吸引眼球，为这个多➕一星。
神偷军团 说是《活死人军团》的前传，其实和《活死人军团》关系不大，单独做一部电影也挺好。故事比较老派，各种闯关打怪，加上开保险箱其实也不稀奇，从整体来看会比较平庸。但架不住演员好，虽然主角也是导演，这种浑身是戏的感觉一下给电影加了很多分。小扎参与了剧本，能感觉出《正义联盟》后他对群像很入迷，神偷军团 里也有点群像的意思，但导演兼男主角一口气把戏都集中到自己身上了，反倒好看。
刺激感太低，剧情没新意，爆米花都不爆了。。。
自导自演的多半都不会是优秀的作品，结尾真的很差，车上开保险柜更是神扯
有好玩好看的地方，但是剧情转折之生硬真的是。。。一系列传奇保险箱就是靠听就是同样的机关。。。是这届观众不配更精妙的机关吗？
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
