Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
影片以文献式老胶片的黑白视觉营造年代质感与折射战争残酷，以行云流水般的长镜头赋予观众极大沉浸感体验。全片在诗意画境中筑就人性的生与死、残酷与坚忍，反思了战争对于个体的影响以及对群体的意义。
剧作方面还是散了点，导致影片内涵很浅，如此拍电影，讲故事似乎成了一件形式主义的事情。
只能说是别具一格的战争片，故事呈现的战争地点不是城市楼宇、小镇街巷，而是在山间田野。
画面太美了，风格想起让人《影》，内容想起《敦刻尔克》，整体还是像流水账了。
太做作了。黑白就黑白吧，還把亮度調那麼暗，讓我一度以為多年前做的近視手術是不是終於讓我失去了對光的敏感。不知道導演是不是覺得低亮度的畫面能給粗糙的畫面增添藝術感，但電影的最主要受眾還是影院裡面的觀眾，畫面怎麼說也應該在人類生理的舒適范圍內。這麼暗的畫面，真的沒有看下去的興趣。加上生硬的方言配音，說著很書面化，完全不口語化的台詞。真難受。
毫无理由服从命令的军人同镜子中的自己一起实现了对战争所存在意义的解构
这样一群热血沸腾的少年接连英勇赴死，肩负着使命去完成不可能完成的任务，那种感觉很戳心。
调色仿佛直接套了个PR的Day 4 Night Lut，对比度不足的同时还能出现大量的死黑，美院审美就这水平吗？莫把偏色当高级了。
能把虽然史实上未必准确但是情感渲染很好的原著拍的这么流水账也是一种本事
无名英雄也是英雄，当永远铭记，他们舍生取义虽逝犹生。
电影应该是多元的，战争片也不应当仅仅聚焦于宏大。就这一点，这片就值得给个好评。
看完感觉有点不痛不痒，当是丰富日本历史之了吧…
想给3.5 风格化做到了，尤其是最后的红雨，很震撼。但是个别镜头很出戏（尤其是中间有一个明显的镜头拉进，我甚至有种看伪纪录片的恍惚）。关注战争小人物的微观叙事，视角很好，但是还不够微观。比如丁松柏这个人物的转变，聚焦了但完全没有进入人物内心:战友死了，自责、悔恨、想做些什么作为救赎、认识到超越生死的责任……于是不想娘了，不怕死了，决定舍生取义——这些都是观众从阅读过的无数革命故事中条件反射般脑补的，而不是影片呈现给观众的。不能说一点效果没有，但是影片本身可以更细腻更精彩。不过，比起民族主义和宏观叙事，还是宁可这样的影片多一点。
回忆录式的叙事风格让故事线清晰易懂，但还是略显紧凑…而且不太喜欢原田导演对女性的描写…
没想到战争影片也可以用这样的呈现方式来表达，酷似水墨画的那种画面质感特别而独具美感，非常迷人的一部电影。
没有刻意的打造强戏剧冲突，非常写实，一瞬间就能把人拉回那个年代。
不过，属实太流水账了。
故事没有《狙击手》讲的清晰明了，情节不自然的地方太多了。
单看海报就感觉好有画面感，期待看到这部电影，期待中国电影能够一直有创新不断突破～～电影人，加油！
很明确这不是一部一般意义的战争片，它更像是一首诗，一首用氛围感烘托出的晦暗、恐怖、炸裂、生猛的诗，一首直击心灵的诗，一首充满悲壮又饱含希望的诗，值得细细品味。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
