Synopsis
"Falsely accused as the murderer of my own husband... Oh, the cruel machinations of fate!" A female teacher (Lee Yong-ae) gives shelter to an escaped convict, but her husband, misconstruing her intentions, reacts violently and accidentally stabs himself to death in the process. The teacher is charged with her husband's murder, but fortunately the prosecutor on the case is a former student of hers, of whom she had taken painstaking care when she was working at an elementary school. Remembering her kindness to him, the prosecutor uncovers her innocence in court, and she is acquitted of the crime.
Notes
"A silent movie that allows us to examine the narrator-accompanied method of 16mm films" (Chung Jong-wha)
A Public Prosecutor and a Teacher is familiar to us for the performance of Shin Chool, Korea's last silent movie narrator (known as "byeonsa"in Korean). Numerous critics have recommended the film, praising it as "a silent movie that allows us to examine the narrator-accompanied method of 16mm films" (Chung Jong-wha), "the work of Korea's last silent movie narrator" (Kim Hong-joon), a movie that "reflects the public's consciousness and has great historical value" (Lee Seung-hun), and "the archetypal new-school film" (Chung Sung-il). As evidenced by such commentary, A Public Prosecutor and a Teacherenjoys greater recognition for its historical value as the only surviving silent movie in Korea than for its artistic or technical aspects. What is ironic is the fact that this recognition derivesfrom a production and screening method that fell behind the times, as sound films (or "talkies") had already become the norm when the movie was first made. Its inclusion in the list is therefore based on its historical, social context rather than on the film itself.
Afterword:
- Narrated by Shin Chool, who is known as Korea's last silent film narrator, A Public Prosecutor and a Teacherhas been screened at several film festivals since the latter half of the 1990s.
所有国家都在与问题的斗争中进步，只有我们在没问题的自嗨中坠落
结尾差点意思，总体来说很不错，看完了能引发人的思考。
一锅乱炖，乱炖一锅，为反转而反转，简直到了可笑的地步。密不透风的音乐哦，耳朵和脑仁儿被轰两个多小时。
最明显的证据，就是以副督察为主角，围绕他编织的故事，反讽力度一般，而那些受害者面对的真正困境，缺乏有力的刻画和展现，那才是本片的核心诉求，只可惜再次沦落为故事技巧下的牺牲品。
越来越敢拍的印度电影，反转很棒。但想表达的点有点多，整体观感不如杰伊比姆。
典型的印度电影，除了跳舞其他元素都在的，各种渲染，可惜我并不感冒。并不怀疑故事的真实性，只是太刻意也太没创意了，如副校长当着媒体的面的的讲话有点离谱，为了调动观众的情绪可以理解但有点过了，如警察同时审判四个嫌疑犯也太扯了，如我不太明白印度女人头巾戴了又摘摘了又戴了的区别，只是了解肯定有象征意义，可惜我也没兴趣知道了。
正义虽迟但到。不得不说，这电影挺牛的，既直白地揭露了某些社会不公的现象和讽刺了某些政客为了上位不择手段，又做到了多重反转。看到最后还挺解气的。
印度在题材上的大胆和韩国电影不相上下。真是让我们望尘莫及。
基本叙事框架还没搭好就已情绪先行。
校园腐败，司法腐败，政府腐败，
印度都能拍出这种水平电影了，庭审部分相当精彩。
故事B：种姓制度下寒门博士难改命50连跳；
而每一个细节动机却经不起可信度推敲。
沒有鋪墊就開始煽情唱歌，庭審整個歪掉反掉了，應該圍繞程序正義和事實還原來打，結果是充斥無意義的詭辯，控方在論證死者該死被告無罪（黑人問號），辯方在證明死者不該死被告有罪（？？？）。
一个国家的尊严等同于它给女性的尊严。
印度又一部批判体制的电影，敢于发声的电影，对于热点社会议题没有进行更深层次的探讨，好在讲故事的手法，角色的反转，还能吸引人看下去。前面半个小时的处理不太好，为了后面法庭戏的反转模糊了故事，又想调动大众情绪，总是情绪先于故事，很难让人共情。
我们对它呈现出的“尖锐”的赞美仅仅来自于我们遭受的审核制度。
【6.5-】看完回想这个故事一开始到底起始于什么主题，女性主义、社会movement 、法律与正义、后真相、种姓制度、政治阴谋…无数次剧情“反转”的背后也是主题的反转，大部分问题讨论到一半就被另一个问题所替代，两个半小时的篇幅仍然没有一点让人喘息的空间，导演似乎想把整个印度社会都放进影片中，放大每一个相关者的情感，但终究在一次次的抒情、闪回与反转中再而衰三而竭。就像片中法庭戏上的那句台词说的，问题太多，每十五分钟就要高血压一次，直到最后疲惫到无力关心人物与事件的结局。凭借剪辑与叙事诡计造就的人设反转又何尝不是一种后真相时代的叙事常态呢？最遗憾的其实是，这些我们一个都拍不了的主题他们都能拍，但大多都只浅尝辄止了。
看完很震撼，在国内广电总局此类题材一定是过不了审的，一天到晚报道印度日本韩国的负面新闻，但说实话，印、日、韩在电影娱乐方面真的是已经不知道甩中国多远了
总有人追求公平正义。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
