Min Ji-suk runs a "ticket bar"where customers can purchase tickets for certain "services"in the town of Sokcho in Gangwon-do. She hires Miss Yang (Ahn So-young), Miss Hong (Lee Hye-young), and Se-young (Jeon Se-young) through the employment agency. Miss Yang and Miss Hong, who are well experienced in this type of business, are used to accepting propositions from customers. But Se-young, who is dating a college student named Min-su, rejects all requests for sexual favors. When Min-su professes to having problems with his tuition and finances, Se-young reassures him that she will procure the necessary funds for him. When the bar's clientele begins to dwindle because of Se-young, Ji-suk reprimands her severely. Se-young develops a close relationship with a Captain Pak and even allows him to sleep with her. She asks Captain Pak to find Min-su employment on a boat, but when Min-su comes to Sokcho for his new job, he sees how Se-young has been making her living. Shocked, he turns his back on the job and leaves. When he eventually returns to Sokcho, he scathingly denounces Se-young's morality and severs their relationship. Decades ago, Ji-suk had stumbled into the bar business in a desperate effort to support her husband, who was serving time in prison; she later left him voluntarily out of shame and moral degradation. Concerned that Se-young will end up with the same fate, Ji-suk asks Min-su to meet with her. She begs him not to abandon Se-young, but he flatly refuses. Ji-suk reacts by pushing Min-su into the sea, and suffers a mental breakdown that lands her in a psychiatric institution.
不想说太多，真的很糟糕，很让人失望。制作层面很精良，视觉上也很舒适，技术环节无可指摘；但影片实质还是相当地干瘪和空泛，堆砌出的只是一个又一个夸张的姿态。表演层面并不理想，但这不能完全责怪演员，这种情况明显更多是导演的问题，拉雷恩在《第一夫人》中就给娜塔莉波特曼带入了一个错误的方向，如今又回到人物传记的冲奖路线，我只能说对于如何使用小k，他连阿萨亚斯的十分之一都不及，对于如何用坏一个演员，他倒是能和冲奥功利心同样重的汤姆霍伯比烂。原则上虽然我不看剧，但此刻无比好奇《王冠》中的Emma Corrin是如何演绎这个人物的…
讲戴安娜王妃的三天，画面太亮，音乐太吵，表演太差，英音太别扭，长得太不像。
她被凝视，被束缚，被不知所措，被选择，也只能突破这一切，ks这一次的表演还算是完成度很高的
#观影手记# 2355
观感很美，但是这样一部通篇就是在真实情况已经无从得知的情况下为了戏剧冲突大肆编派渲染，把戴安娜写的像一个神经病的电影，不知道除了给创作班底在颁奖季靠王室赚取眼球甚至奖项外还有什么意义？KS首先无论扮相还是表演都根本不像两个半大小子的妈，其次有些时候的仪态看着真难受，一个“女主对着动物说话”一个“独自痛哭流涕”的“大女主戏”必备“展现演技”桥段也实在烂俗。
没有太烂吧，但是挺无聊的，导演和编剧采用了一个同情的视角，全程很压抑到最后才有了一个解放。就像影片开头所说的，‘A fable from a tragedy’，那个佣人Maggie对Diana的表白一下子把电影带到了另一种情感里去，所有同情戴安娜王妃遭遇的人都应该会喜欢这个带有梦幻色彩的结尾吧。
女主全片儿完全一个表情，就是我要疯了。
王宫像天鹅绒纱网，人脸像苍白柔美的塑像打上粉扑，魅影一样的质感。
Rather "The Crazy Commoner-became-princess" than "Spencer". A badly written story - it's a series of foreign commoner's presumptions on what it would be like for an American sweetheart's life in prince diana's shoes. The logic of her breakdowns doesn't stand - she knew the way of life before she signed herself in. In short - utter crap.
穿婚纱的那个镜头里，小k美到我傻眼。怎么说呢，居然跟王妃共情了，这不就是最近上班如坐牢的我吗？？？
恐怖片…
宝藏影评，强推！！！
乍一看太像EmmaWatson了吧，让她演说不定也有一番看点，通篇不敢大声说话真的看得人要抑郁了，那个whisper的氛围真的压抑，太堵了
女主全片儿完全一个表情，就是我要疯了。
戴安娜不停抱怨老房子(空气中有维多利亚女王的皮屑...),她就生在宫殿里好吗。
主妇惊悚，走向不是绝望而是自由。Maggie这条线拍得太烧女了，从中景切到特写就表露了太多。
Pain delivered through Jonny Greenwood.
观感很美，但是这样一部通篇就是在真实情况已经无从得知的情况下为了戏剧冲突大肆编派渲染，把戴安娜写的像一个神经病的电影，不知道除了给创作班底在颁奖季靠王室赚取眼球甚至奖项外还有什么意义？KS首先无论扮相还是表演都根本不像两个半大小子的妈，其次有些时候的仪态看着真难受，一个“女主对着动物说话”一个“独自痛哭流涕”的“大女主戏”必备“展现演技”桥段也实在烂俗。
和《第一夫人》的镜头语言一致，和对立人物对话全用正反打，和亲近人物在一起用同框镜头。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
