Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
我能理解大家不中意它的原因，但我还是相当爱的。像是硬汉侦探故事的回潮，deco风，柔光，爵士，豪门闺怨，试图洗去罪孽的佳人，永远怅然于醉酒与忧郁的侦探。这次，主角一样也在灯火阑珊处伸出拳脚，被迷恋模糊爱欲与事实的边界。只是马洛与卢•阿彻们总能适时抽身，在场外冷眼望尽每一颗心；而这次，尼克选择踏入故事，让从不圆满的回忆在他的观测里尽述温柔。
不得不说导演的脑洞还是挺大的 叙述一个未来世界的爱情悲剧 可惜到头来阿祖还是没有收手 你的杂交英语给大家整乐了
“你将踏上一段旅途，回忆之旅，祝你旅途愉悦！相爱，至死不渝！”
我一看到有《西部世界》里那个黑鬼女的就想差评了！演技差到爆炸，这两星是给吴彦祖的。
全程bug，快进1.5倍加狼叔的腹肌、吴彦祖的英夹中也挽救不了的剧情…… 无语子，你们是有多缺钱花才接的这个剧本？
不应该对它执念不忘 朝未来吧..
「跟我說一個故事」
这故事套路，设定奇怪，世界观倒是让人有点好奇，但没讲多少。所以，看不看随你，“朋友”。
有这样的时空隧道，真的是太棒了。吴彦祖的亮相很精彩，就是混杂着中文的台词让我鸡皮疙瘩一地。悬疑的节奏稍稍慢了点。
预告加上放慢的BGM本来还觉得蛮爽的 正片完全就是莫名其妙……
没啥意思，不建议浪费时间，浪费了这些好演员
剧情无新意，彦祖说华语，狼叔无体力，丽姐没有动作戏。
整部电影只有女主角在唱歌的时候是最好看的了，剧本太烂。
一片情深得让人无法理解，那个科幻设定也很一般。
电影里面有个科普点很有意思，我们不可能记住那些被我们忽略的人事物，也就是说所有带着情绪能量的发生，无论是恐惧还是喜悦，它们更会让我们记得。也因为如此，我们容易在未来的行动中被受控于这些回忆。特别是恐惧层面，当下的环境永远是新的，但我们却以旧的记忆和与这些记忆一起的反应模式在面对。心身灵层面说的清理，就是需要我们一次次去看见和放下每一次旧有记忆的浮现，包括其背后的束缚和捆绑，并在当下做出新的反应，建立新的神经元。另外想到的一个点，我们也可以利用冥想和愿景中爱和热情的能量，去反复体验，让他们成为某种类似”记忆“的点，并作调频和校准。
这导演这几年是没看片还是咋了？这也太老派！太土了！
分数：75
设定很好，构思也很好，但是我打心眼里不喜欢这个故事。是讲阴谋还是讲爱情，选一个说清楚吧。爱情不让人觉得深刻，倒是让这故事里的人花了一辈子去记住。
朋友you should worry about that dam more than your妞
预告加上放慢的BGM本来还觉得蛮爽的 正片完全就是莫名其妙……
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
