女生事业单位体检项目 高清

评分:
9.0 推荐

分类: 剧情片 内地 1993

导演: 冯小刚   

剧情介绍

  Synopsis
  "Falsely accused as the murderer of my own husband... Oh, the cruel machinations of fate!" A female teacher (Lee Yong-ae) gives shelter to an escaped convict, but her husband, misconstruing her intentions, reacts violently and accidentally stabs himself to death in the process. The teacher is charged with her husband's murder, but fortunately the prosecutor on the case is a former student of hers, of whom she had taken painstaking care when she was working at an elementary school. Remembering her kindness to him, the prosecutor uncovers her innocence in court, and she is acquitted of the crime.
  Notes
  "A silent movie that allows us to examine the narrator-accompanied method of 16mm films" (Chung Jong-wha)
  A Public Prosecutor and a Teacher is familiar to us for the performance of Shin Chool, Korea's last silent movie narrator (known as "byeonsa"in Korean). Numerous critics have recommended the film, praising it as "a silent movie that allows us to examine the narrator-accompanied method of 16mm films" (Chung Jong-wha), "the work of Korea's last silent movie narrator" (Kim Hong-joon), a movie that "reflects the public's consciousness and has great historical value" (Lee Seung-hun), and "the archetypal new-school film" (Chung Sung-il). As evidenced by such commentary, A Public Prosecutor and a Teacherenjoys greater recognition for its historical value as the only surviving silent movie in Korea than for its artistic or technical aspects. What is ironic is the fact that this recognition derivesfrom a production and screening method that fell behind the times, as sound films (or "talkies") had already become the norm when the movie was first made. Its inclusion in the list is therefore based on its historical, social context rather than on the film itself.
  Afterword:
  - Narrated by Shin Chool, who is known as Korea's last silent film narrator, A Public Prosecutor and a Teacherhas been screened at several film festivals since the latter half of the 1990s.

评论:

  • 帆涵 2小时前 :

    有惊喜,没有硝烟战火,简单几场戏却把希特勒和他的德意志帝国描绘得如此令人窒息和恐惧。

  • 天逸 6小时前 :

    在《至暗时刻》之前看,历史课就篇章就顺对了。演员阵容整齐,各个有担当,画质精良,细节都能看出考量。只是被007和碟中谍还有神奇特工类高科技spy战喂熟了后,看80年前传纸条打世界大战觉得恍惚然。

  • 卫煜宽 8小时前 :

    三星半,还行,不过,试图给张伯伦翻案,好似不是那个理。

  • 向娟巧 0小时前 :

    哎也是不知道是不是历史重现 - 2022 Jan.

  • 富凯凯 1小时前 :

    故事把那个年代的人可能会经历的所有历史事件都套到了两位男主身上,还有模板式的人物设定和关键节点抉择,这编剧大概是看了几百本二战耽美同人吧,怎么能融合的这么丝滑?

  • 奇仪芳 7小时前 :

    原以为是要给张伯伦洗白,没想到是还原事实…

  • 弘向山 2小时前 :

    2022.05.15我们不能选择生活的时代,但我们可以选择如何回应。致敬热血青年!

  • 家荣 5小时前 :

    这没想到这么烂,再精美的服化道也掩盖不了剧本的弱智,不知道是原著小说的弱还是改编的弱,种种不符基本逻辑、违背常识的弱智场景看得让人尴尬要死(您干嘛不再喊大声点“我要刺杀希特勒”),“夏洛特小姐”和老戏骨们也救不了这烂戏,俩男主角除了长得好看演技也是令人尴尬,一个面瘫一个“马景涛”。。。

  • 尉泽雨 3小时前 :

    除了杰瑞米艾恩斯的表演外,这部电影可以说毫无是处

  • 卫家诚 7小时前 :

    出乎意料的紧张刺激,也从侧面提现了张伯伦的性格和理念

  • 张简雪漫 5小时前 :

    欧美也是这一套,坏的只是这个人,而不是反思制度

  • 孔鹏池 8小时前 :

    We don't choose the times we live in. The only choice we have is how we respond.

  • 强英光 9小时前 :

    虽然明明知道结局,但是还是有被过程紧张到。如果不阻止他犯罪,等他犯罪的时候再阻止就太晚。如果成功阻止他犯罪,那又如何证明他原本会犯罪。这真是悖论。其实想一想,就跟因为有人有犯罪的倾向就提前把他抓起来或者提前杀掉是一个道理。

  • 堵雅容 1小时前 :

    已然没落的当年世界老大对没有及时制止纳粹的托词

  • 彤帆 7小时前 :

    英国外交官不回家的原因找到了 心系德牧 (荞麦和三姐别搭了演完母子演夫妻这俩人真没啥cp感) 无论如何做出过努力而不是在等死,总会有希望,而不抱希望会更好。车内道别一场,美人流泪心痛!

  • 侯鹏涛 7小时前 :

    唯一露怯的就是希特勒的描写,演员的因素特别大。在该有张力的地方演员没有演出强迫感,使得对手的紧张显得有点莫名其妙。找不到特型演员,至少找个气场强的吧……希特勒的压迫感还没有护卫队的队长强。

  • 卫铮祢 6小时前 :

    战争一直都没有结束

  • 夷远悦 7小时前 :

    以为是讲少年气的血勇败给绥靖老头儿们的老奸巨猾,却原来最后成了为张伯伦洗地、平反。对这位厌战老兵“和平首相”的新解有所了解,但将之塑造为“我不下地狱谁下地狱”、以甘愿自侮不惧出丑而为国家为欧洲争取到宝贵时间⋯⋯啊,多少也是拐弯拐得有点急。不知道苏台德但泽斯克的人们愿不愿意接受这样的“委曲”。对照俄侵乌的当下,倒是令人唏嘘,历史不过是复读机,同样的台词、同样的人设,一次次地重演。两个男主演得相当不错。另:一次次地,那么多人曾经想肉体消灭大魔王,都没成功。这是天数,天不灭曹,人类的劫数。

  • 强诚 2小时前 :

    强国分瓜弱国默,人微言轻逆势难。

  • 仆梦旋 4小时前 :

    1/5,这谍战拍的是来搞笑的吗?什么叫做毫无紧张感;这片子拍出来是为了洗白张伯伦吗?德国反对派那条线拍的真是有够烂~~~

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved