Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
家庭伦理隐喻，控制欲带来的灾难，最后小女孩的血复活了鸟人替代了自己也算圆满
根本不知道看了个啥玩意。能明白导演借助孵化这个形式表达变态的家庭关系，还有青春期对自我的追寻，但方法真的太奇怪了我不理解。
女儿在强势的母亲不断的精神操控下，恶一点点孵化最后吞噬掉善良
其中的道理经得起时间考验，但作为一部影视作品，观赏性就明显不足够了。两星。
挺悲伤一故事 女孩死去 鸟怪取代 没人在意女主的感受 这样家庭下的孩子都是悲哀的
每一个听话孩子的心里是不是都有一个小怪物，如果父母一味的想要一个乖宝宝，最好的办法是在约束的范围下任其发展，有好有恶，这才是一个完整的正常人。
最近看的几部北欧的恐怖片都很对我的胃口。这部也不算严格意义的恐怖片吧，不如把它看成冷酷青春成长物语怪兽version
2021.10.06陪姑娘看的，银兴东融。鲁西西真好。看的好感动。小孩子也有大力量，看哭了。孩子的世界很单纯，要多给他们一些理解和支持。
为啥热评在吐槽小女孩演技，我觉得演得很好啊，设定也挺新颖的，不过剧情方面悬疑性少了点，基本上到了一半就差不多明白是咋回事了。
典型亚洲虎妈和被完全驯化的子女的形象被塑造得淋漓尽致，却是北欧片，蛮神奇的。
我孵化了它，我现在不想要它了……但我还是会为它付出一切，包括生命，我明白它也是爱我的
作为童年童话的一种重新认识与解读，我个人还是有一些期待的。虽然最后作品呈现出来的效果有一点勉强，整体感觉还是手法和方式不专业，但是能在屏幕上重新看到郑渊洁童话以这样的方式出现，还是有些许的激动的，希望能看到更加成熟的作品吧。
其中的道理经得起时间考验，但作为一部影视作品，观赏性就明显不足够了。两星。
加班空闲看了几段，还挺好。寓教于乐。消防培训剪辑用一用。
这种毫无观赏性的电影不知道拍出来有什么意义，可能就是满足豆瓣上某些自以为很牛逼的傻X吧。
看罐头小人的时候我多大？大概是初一初二吧01年的事情了。一晃二十年了。我已经什么都不记得了。
简直是匪夷所思，片子让我对北欧的印象大打折扣，没什么文化
a twisted family但很喜欢结局，妈妈的小女孩变成不会累的孩子，真的是东亚family issues照进欧洲。女孩和鸟的bonding moment看出到了年初羊惧的影子，鸟越发变成人形，女孩的家庭压抑情绪到达顶点。
完成度很高的惊悚家庭片。虎妈+自由出轨的一家之主妈，封闭自我甩手掌柜的爸，女儿想把妈妈的婚外情告诉爸爸，结果爸爸沉浸在自己的世界压根不打算管，好真实…妈妈失恋的模样也好真实，弟弟的心机也好真实
还不错吧，效果剧情都还可以，只是结尾有点儿差事儿，再编排的合理点儿就好了！一念之间的感觉！人的心理都有阴暗面，只是在事情面前哪个占主导，一念天堂一念地狱。。。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
