Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
你知道了你敢拍吗？拍了能批准公映嘛？“可他妈老子也是一个有良心的艺术家！”最终剧中的制作团队被“不可抗力”团灭，“潜规则”超级强大的哈。
好看！海兆丰说我是你影迷的时候我迷之落泪！
🆘意料之中的无感甚至略微反感，很讨厌这种不好好说话的电影，严肃题材的喜剧展现方式总是令人尴尬…可以但没必要。
像这种在固定地点拍摄，全片讲一桩凶杀案的电影现在逐渐成型，影迷通常称为“剧本杀电影”，包括前段时间的《不速之客》《利刃出鞘》，这种低成本喜剧悬疑我挺喜欢的。
观影体验很好，整个舞台感话剧腔拿捏得很漂亮。这种有强烈风格的内容，一旦和其中的某一个烂梗同频，就知道可以对上信号了。但缺点也有，一个劲把故事往上推，似乎失去了电影该有的呼吸感，属于体验＞内容＞形式。
主创用心良苦。要是没被前半部分的故作浅薄无聊劝退，坚持看完全片，会发现这是一部很有诚意的佳作。
扎实的剧本，精彩的群戏，恰到好处的舞台剧质感，以及自然不生硬的笑点。整体节奏紧凑不拖沓，戏剧性营造的很足。
前半部分真的给人优秀春晚小品的感觉，包袱抖的利落，嘲讽隐射的话很多，射程范围广，虽不太像电影但看得很开心，而后半个小时出乎意料，可以看出主创真的热爱电影，也分得清主次，是很用心的在讲好一个故事，顺便抖抖机灵，而不是用个随便的故事去生硬的串联一些搞笑的段子。
主角团里最喜欢烂片导演和过气影帝，灭火小分队队长压迫感好强，但我还是想睡齐乐山
剧本杀风格夹带喜剧悬疑，线索流畅，观感颇佳
里八神的本子，有他一贯的诙谐幽默讽刺
一个大关节不错的剧本安排进了老旧的笑料和一看就知道要呼应的伏笔，把整部电影的质感变得塑料。“像我爸爸”“假发对假发夜莺被摧毁”这些我都提前猜到了。
留白很多，当李家辉以为自己掌握了真相，或许是齐乐山帮他策划的真相，暗线在明线下隐藏，而暗线又有很多解读，很不错
十个项目九个凉，商业投资很正常～套用剧本杀形式构建不断反转层次丰富的文本，看得出是万合天宜一堆编剧集思广益堆砌的产物，然而起承转合不太高明，含沙射影犹如隔靴搔痒，有时候作品的表达欲太强给人的观感只会过犹不及。
形式话剧体，舞台感，商业制作程度高，还是老套的剧情，情节各种大杂烩（太多的迷影梗和流行梗)，悬疑氛围不强，中间那几个喜剧桥段差点出戏，结尾廉价煽情处理一大败笔，手法可以看作是《报告老板》至尊顶配版或者是低配版《利刃出鞘》，有些台词某种程度上也是对行业某些现象的无奈和嘲讽，吐槽审查乃是最佳。应该讲，这时节能有这么一部商业电影也算不错了。6.9
就记得尹正演技是真有点子烂，本煜演技有惊到，短评点出沉船版结局，看到各种暗喻自我阉割成惯性第一反应是这是能说的吗，国产算好的电影了
可能是我知道的太多？脑洞开的太大？
说真的这年头我是真的对表演特别拿腔拿调的电影喜欢不起来，像之前《血观音》就是一个例子，这里现在又多了一个。尽管你说这些电影的立意再怎么高深都好…尽管你讽刺了官官相护的习性、影视圈的潜规则和对电影审查制度的影射，且不说你讽刺的好不好，起码从情节阐述来看讽刺已经到位了，但，能不能请你收一收，别整这么夸张的行吗，鸡皮疙瘩都起来了。
结局以为新故事开始，新闻报道却暗示剧组成员的死亡
也算不上什么精巧的故事，杂糅借鉴了很多的经典悬疑电影。没有成功营造起悬疑悬念如阿加莎无人生还那种的严肃惊悚感，本来定位就是偏喜剧，但也没多好笑，更多的还是万合天宜那种拿腔捏调的网络情景喜剧，如李编剧在剧本分析会上所说，我们要偏重于还原真实的案情，但这部电影恰恰拿捏在戏谑与严肃之间，两头不靠，哪头都不够彻底，不够痛快。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
