Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
“不管再来几次，都请鼓起勇气，发出你们的声音吧。你们要发出比那些卑劣者更响亮、更理直气壮的声音。”
喜欢的演员凑一块
三星半，这么低的分，不喜欢的人应该是觉得太扯太荒诞太文艺腔了，比起爱情片更像是一部思考生命意义的狂想曲(虽然这么说太俗了)，所以后半部才是不老奇事也只是男主的幻想而已，并不是科幻。王朔这么多年了还是在表达“成功不就是挣点钱让傻逼们知道吗” ，不过这样的“烂片”比那些庸俗的烂片可强多了
关于离别、生死和爱，1h09m画幅的渐变是分界线，也预示着郭小鲁和苏凌芳关系的转变，窄画幅是《阿甘正传》中Forrest和Jenny，宽画幅是《本杰明·巴顿奇事》中的Benjamin和Daisy。
看哭。
两个地方挺打动我的：电吉他演奏的青春舞曲和朋友再见，活脱脱就是那个时代的躁动和蓬勃。萌萌的手术，和教授死后捐献遗体的解剖——父女两人站位的对调，以及两次主刀的张小鲁。一生一死，一少一老。看得我简直泪崩。
不错的影片，质感很好，有年代感与胶片感，果然每个人难以忘怀的都是自己的青春。片中有很多人的死亡，突然离世的父亲，最终放弃抢救的老教授，和冒险拿身体试验的丁萌萌，每个人都对于不老不死有自己的态度，对人生有自己的活法。如果没有记忆，不老的躯壳好像也没有太多意义了。中间的成名，男主角的不老以及最终的车祸，离婚，女儿的出生和长大，都好似导演给观众编制的美好梦境一般，现实往往充斥残酷，很不错的影片，演的也很好。
有些类似《本杰明巴顿奇事》
略科幻还是奇幻？总之是有些超前于当下认知的。但，感情细腻却也是真。过王萌萌的执着，让人不禁唏嘘；郭小鲁和苏凌芳的纠缠也让人唏嘘，苏凌芳的命运更是如此....刚开始的电影，还以为要讲八九十年代科学家们的奉献精神，后来才发现，想表达的是生命意义层面的东西。
主题是很有意思的。不同的人经历了地震，失去家人，每个人的命运也随着自己的选择而走上不同的路。
没有人的死是无所谓的。得不到保护的人们，你们要发出比那些卑劣者们更响亮、更理直气壮的声音。
秋田alive theatre。大意了，以为《犬部》看懂了就敢闯社会悬疑片的场子，结果细节各种懵，还好剧情都能搞清楚。虽然海报c位给了佐藤健，但宽叔仍然是片里最大的咖。佐藤健的阴郁戏份表现极佳，劝圆山那里有点崩（不过人设突然拐弯，的确太难了）。林桑没有特别出彩的地方。有这样的片子背书，我有点担心保险料会继续涨…
纯纯有大病的电影，在电影院度过的两小时我真的很迷惑
怕的是有话语权但欠缺专业能力的人当了编剧导演不知道真傻还是自觉权利不配对没有人敢去质疑其不合理性否则自己显得很傻缺于是一群正经的人呕心沥血生出来一个四不像作家和编剧本来就不是一回事说八百遍
就是 宽叔太帅了。
标题就叫《孤寡老人活活饿死，究竟该怪谁？》
为了宽叔给四星。单看宽叔五星。
“那段清晰而又绵长的记忆，是我这辈子最快乐的时光”
没有恸哭，却悲情得压抑始终……在天灾中，生与死像是被随机选择，去问“为什么”得不到任何答案！除了接受现实，自我吞咽痛苦再，凭意志，慢熬着时光消化，没有别的任何办法。一旦偏激到片中的孤女小干那样，不认命去迁怒他人，只会再酿人祸～这世间，不是什么都能判个对错。
一般套路 懂得都懂😂 情感满分 剧情。。。 林老师也救不了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
