You are never fully liberated from Auschwitz, 11 July 2016 Author: Red-125 from Upstate New York The French movie "À la vie" was shown in the U.S. with the translated title "To Life (2014)." It was written and directed by Jean-Jacques Zilbermann. The film is a Post-Holocaust saga, although it opens with scenes in Auschwitz that are truly horrific. Hélène (Julie Depardieu) and Lily (Johanna ter Steege) were friends in Auschwitz, and they managed to survive the death march from Auschwitz to Louslau together. A third friend, Rose (Suzanne Clément) was unable to walk, so they were forced to leave her behind. As it turned out, Rose survived until the liberation of Auschwitz. The three did not see each other again until 1962, when they come together for a reunion at a beachside resort in Northern France. We learn early in the movie that Lily divorced her husband after the war, and is living as a "free soul," with no permanent partner. Hélène and Rose both married concentration camp survivors. The plot of the film--based on the lives of three actual friends--revolves around their interactions during the reunion. No matter how much ice cream they eat, and how they display their new bathing suits, thoughts keep circling back to Auschwitz. They quarrel about tiny details which they remember differently. They revive horrible memories. It's clear that the reunion will change their lives, but whether the change will be for the better or for the worse is an open question. For reasons I don't understand, "To Life" caries a terrible IMDb rating of 6.1. Fortunately, we saw it as part of the excellent Rochester Jewish Film Festival. If we hadn't had "All-Event" tickets, we probably would have stayed home. This is a movie to be seen, not missed. Ignore the rating and seek it out. It's available on DVD, and it will work well on the small screen. See it!
隧道里，还有生产那部分算是比较有意思的，其他都一般
最大的问题是无法进行完整双层解读，深层文本的女性困境表达很清楚，但表面现实物理逻辑很难解释清楚，例如男人如何入侵手机？还是蒲公英的致幻效果吗？如果单纯用奇幻或者魔幻来解释中后段的一系列场景，或者只是发生在内心的阴影，那女主闺蜜的戏份又该如何解释？她的视角中是只有物质世界的结果，例如撞车以及血迹。当然后半段的裂手和套娃都太精彩了。
好久没有这么爽的cult片了，断手和套娃绝对永垂邪史。
为了一点醋包了一锅饺子。cult场面没有铺垫部分吓人，恶心更多一点。片末场景女主丈夫说完台词后感想是“就这”…
3.5。把這部電影稱為蝻片可以提前列為年度最令我不理解的十大行為之一。加蘭回退到了一個內核極為簡單的驚悚文本，漏洞百出但不失精簡有效地展現出了恐男心理正當產生的一種途徑。
邪典片儿，最后无限生殖可以留名影史了。不恐怖，然后看不懂。奇特的是友邻都给了极高评价～感觉女主是在跟男主的pua、道德绑架和强加的内疚作斗争，最后好像是赢了，但是貌似也真有人被杀了？隐喻过多，看完致郁，隔壁的黑色电话不香吗不爽吗？奇特的是友邻们都评价很低。也许到头来大家都喜欢自虐吧～ps：加一颗星给Rory，看完才意识到都是同一个演员演的，NB！
前面的风景很美，另一个版本的《我想逃离这一切》，最后的画面过于恶心，令人不适！
却都得不到证实。“我们缺少可类比的对象。”语言学家们总是说。他们进展缓慢，格蕾丝开始称他们为“偷懒学家”，就像冷笑话里说的，“跌倒在路边，被弯曲的隐喻之舌给卷走了”，X区域在搅浑水。然而这其实并非搅浑的水，也不是路边的舌头，他们只是无法理解那些不明不白的东西。“我们缺少可类比的对象”，这本身就是不太明确的诊断。语言学家去过X区域后，再重返地球大气层，便会被烧毁。也许你很容易因此而联想到，报废和即将报废的卫星纷纷坠落至X区域所在的位置，因为太空垃圾忽然消失虽貌似荒谬，但还说得通。然而，把X区域当作垃圾桶似乎显得有点不敬，会冒犯缺乏安全感的神祇。
片如其名 但我对喻得太明显的恐怖片好像喜好程度一般
连环生育 包括闺蜜
有一丢丢莫名其妙的结尾，我还希望再知道一点，到底是这个女的疯了，太内疚，还是咋滴。讲真大屏幕上生孩子就这么整真的没事吗？看着多少有点。。。反正啊是每个人都看得了
Dear Garland: Try to lay some decent plots as groundwork then upon that elaborate on visuals, not the other way round; for instance, at any rate there were some plots, not that they were nearly as stunning as the looks by any means, for the visuals to be based upon in your Annihilation, were there not? Please stick to that formula, comprende?
这些男人除了女主前夫都是一个人演的吧，真是这些油腻猥琐暴力神经的男人毁了这绝美的风景和房子，女主头脑很清醒。
掉落的苹果 漫长的隧道回声
一个男人 地脱身换骨多少遍才能得到女人的爱
愿这世上再没有文艺恐怖片🙏，每次看完都感觉被诈骗了🥹
大抵是真的和加兰无缘。机械姬到湮灭再到男人，空有概念并不是致命点。概念先行的片子有不少我都很喜欢，但实在是在视听，情感甚至是主题上都造成的很差。一丁点才华都没有说的就是这种导演。
奇观电影。整体是女人被男性折磨的故事，总结来说男人真就一个样
层层包裹、恶性自体增殖的男性性欲最后吐出来一个精心包装试图利用女性同理心和负疚感的“我要你的爱”
如果选一个最能够表达女性日常所面临的男性带来的恐惧的词，非“haunted”的莫属。从现实面临的家庭暴力与言语威胁切入，用极端的符号隐喻及画面将女性的恐惧具象化。撕碎宗教与警察带来庇护的谎言，本质还是吃女性。女主吃下苹果后一切不幸随之而来，裸男是亚当，吹开的蒲公英是精子，孕育出怪胎小孩。当女主拿起刀后一切开始变化，躲与藏的主角调换，男性开始孕育生命，一个又一个男人，同一张面孔的男人，最后结尾回到现实，死去的丈夫轻描淡写，只想要爱，真的很讽刺。女性要武器，女性不要仁慈。女性要自我的生活，女性不要道德绑架。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
