Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
“做自己尽力的就好”。虽然剧情强升的价值观有些尬，不过是有些道理的。（顺便一说日和太可爱了！！！）
也只记得画风了…ʕ•̫͡•ʔ
单车后座偷心，成龙杂技盗信；收不了男人，总还能收了男人的妹子；不同的指甲，相同的话语；千纸鹤之树凋谢散落，且把幻想中捅瞎自己只为他能留在身边的折纸重新铺平，逃课狂奔到正在开班会的教室向她告白：“我们再睡一次吧！”……敢爱敢恨有时候是一种极度自私的能力，挺好
战斗太太太草率了，大部分妖怪好人，但又不深刻，没有特别治愈。
岛国人真会玩；
大概是小森生活➕龙猫➕夏目友人帐这样吧，好想讲了啥又好像啥也妹讲～
很多表達過於意象化，沒看過原作只能自己瞎揣摩了，不過整體比想象中強耶
所以，日和，结，遇上了很好的奶奶，奶奶也遇上了很好的她们
剧情比较有意思，画风很日漫，稍有点高开低走，还是蛮好看的
蛮无聊的奇幻治愈电影，有些地方迷之卡顿，后半段打邪祟戏码全程走神，更想看日常治愈向。两间迷途之家的装修都很好看。
很温馨，就是有些魔幻的地方看得我有点尴尬。
前面有点生分，一点点熟络。中间突显夏目友人帐结结活动，后来打倒大boss的确太快了，( ´▽` )ﾉ还好有一丢丢欣慰的是日和的那种小小的努力，我们都无从选择，但我们都可以做力所能及的事。
故事内涵这样一个逻辑：不是怪兽带来了灾难，而是灾难在人们心中留下的悔恨与悲痛引来了怪兽。
好喜欢哦，疗愈伤口找到新的开始，奇妙的妖怪和平淡幸福的童年结合起来连做梦都会漫着笑意
3.5吧，没啥特别的剧情，慢条斯理的讲个故事
故事的核心是温暖的，只是没有足够好的形式表现出来
山田mm很可爱，感觉像是为她量身打造的片子。男主一家完全是为了忖托啦啦主题搞来的配件吧～
人設鮮明很有特點，男主真是位人間清醒的工具人啊，存在只為讓倆女主找到彼此hhhh
宁静的让人觉得美好，色彩细腻美丽，也许一些平凡的小日子相加才是构成人美好生活的组合！
女导演拍百合床戏还是蛮唯美的，女主周旋于情侣间最后作出的选择感觉更倾向于双性恋吧。以信为载体展现第三者从窥视→介入→反客为主的过程，再由信件主客体的变更完成主角从情感到心理的双重转变。杏奈超适配这类面相纯良内里却心机深沉的角色，反差感极大（《EERIE~看不见的脸》里的女JK同理）。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
