Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
从剧情到人设，定位非常低幼，确实是给刚进青春期的小朋友看的，如果从这个角度切入的话一切或许倒也算合理。另外，我实在是不觉得一句“I'm not like that”就值得起立鼓掌，但也许算是个好的开始吧。歌舞编排还不错，还是很喜欢Lisa，挺好
这个片子实在是太一般了也就两星的水平 但是对佳佳布鲁根真的有爱笑滤镜
崔志佳的创作笑点真的可以 演员表演不尴尬 良心不俗 包袱不断 从头笑到尾
南昌拍的，一点看不出来，只看到一个瞬间南昌8度啤酒
歌舞还是传统百老汇室内剧舞台群舞风格，而剧情更接近校园美剧（小学生，初中生）类别，故事情节有些老套。。。还是老问题。。。剧情和歌舞还是有明显割裂感，而且歌舞比重过低。。。只能称之为故事片吧
当🌈闪耀迪士尼的时候 丑陋软的政治正确已经达到让人不舒服的地步了
②开篇旁白跟主线剧情文不对题。跟旁白搭配的剧情应是：男主自己是烧烤店主，为维护自家招牌/保护美食街，参加比赛，PK连锁烧烤店的资本入场，最终赢得比赛。剧情虽然俗套，但爽点足。 而且为了跟开头旁白衔接，以倒叙开始，插入事件起因，结构影响观众共鸣。
意想不到的还可以，剧情简单，也蛮有意思，有点像 食神 的套路。
类型: 喜剧
节奏还行吧、致敬了食神是吧（应该不敢那么明显的抄吧。。
已经算是惊喜了 佳佳啊！跟我现在一样胖了！
②开篇旁白跟主线剧情文不对题。跟旁白搭配的剧情应是：男主自己是烧烤店主，为维护自家招牌/保护美食街，参加比赛，PK连锁烧烤店的资本入场，最终赢得比赛。剧情虽然俗套，但爽点足。 而且为了跟开头旁白衔接，以倒叙开始，插入事件起因，结构影响观众共鸣。
三无作品，无内涵，无下限，无节操！就是段子喜剧片，有笑点和致敬周星驰打两星
爱笑兄弟必须是一直长在我的笑点上，就很好笑啊
好无聊。。换成厕所之王，丝袜之王都可以，感觉丝毫没拍出烧烤的特色。。
这电影就是一个加长的小品，还没小品好玩。。。这再一次说明了一件事儿，那就是电影不是谁都能拍好的，好些演员都觉得自己观众缘好演技好然后自己导个电影应该也不错，但真不是这么回事儿！
意外的感觉很不错，轻松幽默 又能把故事讲明白 挺好的
喜欢的都会喜欢。好久没看到迪士尼这么简单温暖的追梦电影，虽然剧情上没有像魔法奇缘、歌舞青春或者马戏之王这么丰富。但灯光、色调以及运镜都十分的迪士尼，尤其是小男主的表现非常亮眼，当然还有我们喜欢的菲比阿姨。歌曲很好听，结尾的独唱很感人。的确是迪士尼电影的一大突破，隐晦的表现出男主的取向。为什么喜欢唱musical的男孩都会这样，纯爷们就不能喜欢唱音乐剧？
太赞了太赞了！！惊喜啊惊喜！！看的我只想现在来顿烧烤！！！！什么烤串大腰子都安排上！
赶英超美，任重而道远。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
