Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
只有餐勺打架稍微有点意思，没很大能力的话小朋友的绘本果然还是stay绘本的好吧……
m21292：可爱，有爱心。看片很应景，人类应该以爱对待如此可爱忠诚的动物！
just a magic.
李现被雷佳音拍在了沙滩上，这一版的药不然一般，没有夏雨电视剧乔振宇版好。
传奇和胡扯的距离，可以丈量该片剧作。而影片节奏与质感的粗粝，属郭子健一贯水准。演员表演亦在他的调节下全员鸡肋。（但荧幕外是很美好的观影时光呀🐾）
只有我觉得舅舅很帅很可爱吗？还有同班同学也很可爱～
噢，小区邻里之间也太友爱了吧，不过毕竟也是，谁能决绝一只巨大的拉布拉多小可爱呢hhh。电影主题很不错非常适合儿童观看，就是那个亚洲小男孩的造型还是带点外国人对亚洲人的刻板印象以外，其他都还好
狗狗真的是世界上最可爱的 但是故事比较儿童向
理性看片，中间实验室被放出来的那些动物，不是一个生物灾难吗？？？大红狗的比例在前后特效也是有问题
比预期好，很流畅的商业片节奏，甩了很多谜题感觉高级，其实啥也没解释。药不然放这，真的彻底不行。
就… 适合跟小朋友一起看 寓教于乐。大红狗一出现，脑子就自动跳到前段时间看的那只红熊猫去了… 相对来说，更喜欢红熊猫呢。
2021/12/29 MSP alone
看到最后有点与现实的割裂感，倒不是因为特效，感觉是剧情有点低龄了。
3.5星。合家欢电影，小朋友+大狗狗的主角模式，谁还在乎那么多剧情啊，够萌就行啦，至少我看得很欢乐，但成也红色败也红色，总是会忍不住想，如果不是大红狗而是其他颜色的话，会不会更可爱？
故事流畅，质感很差。审美较为苏联，古玩行业很封建。年度最没用女性角色黄烟烟，最膈应场景“好生养”，拜托男明星有点长进混了这么多年还不能用原声出演，你葛大爷并不是只能演老年纪春生。
还是不错的，陪小朋友看最后变成自己看的津津有味，也是挺有意思的了
电影的一部分是两年前的夏天在Cornell Tech拍的，那阵子经常能在楼下看见一只巨大的红色塑料狗…所以原来鄙校是个邪恶的生物基因公司lollllll
雷佳音真的太好了 ，阿如那也很好，其余都不太好呢 那个假佛头有啥用呢
刚刚发现标签功能没了，青春的眼泪。感谢闫中昫和吴同学，是我当时为数不多的小朋友。
毛茸茸可可爱爱。不过红色真的让我很出戏~~~
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
