This was the first of the videos that started a trend of sex education videos in the early 1990s . I guess the idea behind it was for liberated women to go into a high street store and buy it without any type of guilt or inhibition , but no doubt the main buyer market was teenage boys and dirty old men
THE LOVERS GUIDE is groundbreaking in the fact that it publicised that the couples involved were real life partners but this is slightly dishonest , yes the main couple featured Wendy and her husband were indeed a real life couple who'd been married several years but there was some public controversy that at least one of the couples Kathryn ( The gorgeous brunette ) and Marino ( The well buffed geezer with a ponytail ) had never met one another until they appeared on set where they had unprotected sex for the camera . For a video that self righteously dedicates segments to safe sex it is rather hypocritical
Seeing as it's for education purposes and not pornography as such there's limits as to what can be shown but as a sex education video it's not uninformative though I doubt if you'll be gasping " I never knew that "
As a footnote the main couple featured became something of sexual problem agony aunts in the British press - Until it was revealed that Wendy's husband had a serious heart condition which put a stop to sex . I almost felt sorry for this couple who confessed that they used to make love as often as ten times a day but now couldn't make love once a day because it was too dangerous . My small amount of sympathy soon vanished when shortly afterwards the couple split up and raced off to the gutter press in order to dish the dirt on one another to the highest bidder .
It didn't have to be like this.
首尾呼应的镜头。女孩儿之间对身体的好奇，人生的一小处规划，再平常不过的日常，背后付出的却是如此之大的代价。年轻女性的身体在此处彻底去魅，只有撕裂和疼痛。
我想说的是，在一个封闭的社会文化环境下，犯错的是个体，受伤的就不仅是个体了，更是政治，而且是血淋淋的、内心恐惧的、阻止不了的、正发生的。
近两年看了不少堕胎片，除了更痛的观感似乎也无甚亮点，有相像情节的女人韵事和432都比这强太多了……
所有此类题材，目前还是没有一部能超越《四月三周两天》。
几年来欧美各大电影奖项快被女权题材攻陷，这里面的确大都是佳作，然而总吃一道菜也未免腻歪，政治正确也得容人们喘口气吧。
前有《四月三周两天》，因而显得这片子没那么出彩，不过，广大的男同胞们，好好做个人吧。
无子宫者没有资格去控制女性的子宫，而捍卫堕胎本质上就是对生命权的捍卫。
不如《四月三周两天》，女主角很难让人产生共情。窥私镜头太多，令人不适。
在生理心理双重折磨下
很难不想到四月三周两天，听到自然流产女主又活过来了，堕胎画面适合拿去青少年科普
概念get到了，但处理得未免过于生硬。老老实实拍个家庭片可能还能保证个底盘，现在硬要在开篇走心理惊悚的路子只会让人觉得哪哪都不搭。这个戏唯一值得一提的就是它的疫情背景，但是后半程也写没了，看不到这对中产母女的转变，相比日本同样注重新冠背景聚焦底层生活的《茜色如烧》简直毫无灵气甚至也没有匠气，只能说别再捧杀钟孟宏了谢谢。
越看越觉得难受，女性为什么凭什么承受这些？！子宫长在女性身上，生育权却从没有属于女性！这部电影也补充了一些关于六十年代法国的不同面向。以往提到六十年代法国第一印象就是五月风暴，总是伴随着一种理想主义人文精神高光时刻的评价。。但这也是一种非女性的叙事。需要补充太多女性的状况，处境和视角。电影中，在沙滩上ANNE怀孕无法堕胎导致的艰难处境，学政治“男友”和同学被崇拜被当成未来的大人物，这组对照不就是现实中女性话语和历史政治话语的对照吗？想起《反叛缪斯》里讲述的70年代法国女性运动，其中一个行动就是有过堕胎经验的女性签名联合抗议禁止堕胎。作为一种权力的声明，在看完这部电影之后更觉得有力量和愤怒。
期待了几个月总算等到了，还好没有随着噱头大书特书。
迎来了一个“自然流产”的定论
一种只会攻击女人的病，把她们变成家庭主妇的病。是社会病了，和一部分可恶的男人。
还好最后小静没有事
同类型看完还是 四月三周两天 更好，这部有点白开水了。
本来以为去年戛纳金棕榈已经给了一部“最疼片”：《钛》，没想到去年威尼斯金狮“含疼量”更高。简直让人忽略了所谓的表演，或者这是在看一部电影，一切都太真实，无比真实的疼。让人更心疼的是，60年过去了，一切都还如片名一样，女性的困境与悲剧仍——正发生。
头皮发麻。“正发生”恰好也是对当下的警示。本就属于女人的、被剥夺又奋力夺回的对自己身体的处置权，如今又面临着再次被剥夺的风险。所以对女人的子宫虎视眈眈的人都应该看看这部电影，睁开眼睛看看那些痛楚，然后再问问自己的良心（如果有的话）自己凭什么可以禁止女人堕胎。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
