Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
从海报就看出，这是致敬印第安纳琼斯的作品，连反派都是一如既往由德国人担任。不过演员选角看出，似乎在试图复制木乃伊系列的搞笑历险。强生在本片中的人设和之前几部模仿之作，比如地心游记，是一个模子里刻出来的，除了绚丽的场景外，没有什么能够留下深刻印象的东西。
主题园区可以安排了😂丛林里的诅咒种类是不是恶心了点？
剧情太弱智简单了，台词也水的不行，男女主角也不来电，整体毫无亮点可说。1114-晚
好久没看这种奇幻冒险片了，竟然找到了曾经看夺宝奇兵、加勒比海盗的欢乐感觉～剧本也是九零年代复古冒险片的套路，看完很想立刻冲向迪士尼乐园～
Well…To elsewhere，迪士尼还真是想了很多酷儿的同义替换词.
这么复古的维多利亚时代探险故事，现在可真不多见了，迪斯尼看来花不少钱搭外景，但是成片还是给人儿童片的感觉
主题园区可以安排了😂丛林里的诅咒种类是不是恶心了点？
其实还不错，还有点女版印第安纳琼斯的意思，只是这几年秘境寻宝电影不大流行了，强森选择没错，比去速9强。
传统 老派 标准的冒险片 搁八十年代没什么稀奇 搁现在却很难得 毕竟这是一部正儿八经有怪力乱神有妖魔鬼怪存在的冒险片 不是某些打着科学解释旗号的所谓冒险片能比的 影片似乎吸收了加勒比海盗中的黑珍珠号诅咒与荷兰人号诅咒的套路 毕竟都是给迪士尼的乐园项目做宣传的电影 巨石强森这辈子也似乎跟冒险片绑定了 打哪儿都有他 好在几位主角的个人魅力足够撑起影片
#是也乎#
The scenery is so beautiful that this movie is worth watching； The monsters are so terrible that this movie is not suitable for kids.
还不错，剧情中间有反转，典型的迪士尼喜剧。巨石强森真是太man了
看多了 加勒比海盗，木乃伊，勇敢者的游戏后，这片也就那样吧
若干年以后，艺术史可能会这样写：电影这一艺术类型的消亡，始于肉毒素的医用。
现在这种冒险题材的片子也是少得可怜。又一个给堵死的类型片。再怎么拍都摆脱不出印第安纳琼斯、成龙喜剧的影子。
Passably entertaining.
主题乐园电影，仅供儿童玩乐。#迪士尼喂养计划#
迪士尼不愧是搞游乐园的，做这种话探险类的电影真是驾轻就熟。但是把园区里的“森林河流之旅”直接项目直接改编成电影，那我还真的是没想到，[捂脸][捂脸][捂脸]不愧是你爸爸……真的蛮像的……在hk玩的时候的那种感觉真的可以因为这个电影想起来……当时我就担心船要翻……
《地心历险记》《勇敢者游戏》之后巨石强森的奇幻冒险之旅还在继续。整个片子就是非常的迪士尼，迪士尼冒险片式的结构工整到令人发指。元素就是加勒比海盗的魔幻加上夺宝解密再加上非常合时宜的女权，也非常合家欢，很适合小学生观看。
【6】从电影本身角度看，就是个套着无数老框架拍出来的杂糅产物，配上某些好看的大场面特效而已，然后大家都知道了，这是个迪士尼游乐项目宣传片。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
