Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
剧情单一，为了救女儿而斗坏人。除了安志杰其他角色演的太僵硬了，面部表情夸张的就像绷不住了一样，打斗动作设计的先不提，镜头晃的那叫一个恶心，打就打老晃个毛镜头，晃你也是跟着人物走，人物打斗本身都没出一个画面，画面却开始震动摇晃了起来，真垃圾。人物设计风格就跟超能力环境下的漫画一样，押送个女主还得带上口枷，四个人用链子牵着。偶尔明显的露一下大腿露一下胸脯的，太掉价了。
剧情还不错，居然还能穿越到中国，还是挺不错的。
打戏还凑活，文戏零分，这几个演员除了安志杰，都不好看
陪儿子和他小伙伴去看的，竟然看进去了，挺好
已经看过了，刚又看了国语的预告，我的妈，太难听了，还是英文的比较适合这种幽默的动画，并没有什么别的意思，只是觉得英文更贴脸，
杨杏和祁圣翰的疯批样子很迷人啊 特别是杨杏的疯批复仇人设太带感了 很是出彩 打戏蛮精彩的 不过情节真的是一言难尽 一些地方不清不楚的 主角光环实在是太严重了 强行HE也是我个人不喜欢的 不过我愿意为杨杏的表演加一颗星
面对挑战困难危险，积极思考，必有方法。
挺可爱的 虽然剧情有点bug但是不影响小孩子看
太扯淡了，炸弹没炸死，只变瞎了，比夜魔侠都猛
前面的情节略松， 台词故意秀网络流行语， 特别尴尬， 好在后面情节流畅， 节奏紧张， 还是不错的。
单纯看不惯很多人戴着有色眼镜看国产动画电影刻意拉低评分的行为，但也不为过。整体效果很好，跟以往作品拉开极大差距，心里评分4.5
给小孩子看还是不错的
剧情略有些硬，搞笑不错，中国元素丰满但是都是外国制作人
几场动作戏可以的，剧情稍微好点，是可以到6.5分的。
这几年演疯癫人物都陷入了癫狂不是大喊大叫就是疯狂大笑的怪圈里去，从角头2到盲战，太多想塑造癫狂角色但是却狗屁不是的了，真正的癫狂是Leon里的警长而不是练过武功的村口二傻子。
老演员真棒，演技都杠杠的。
李子雄又出来打酱油了，一会儿。安志杰还在认真打，挺帅的。女反派真的很暴走萝莉疯癫款，什么都不在意，我杀杀杀。女儿还是很坚强的，被富二代虐了一轮也没影响。
安志杰一直都不容易。动作好，长得帅，演技不错，就是不火……女反派的动作戏也还行。开头六分钟还是很帅的。故事毕竟网大，还是拉垮。演员都有点用力过猛。动作设计不错，还可以。各种镜头，明显的捧女主啊。女主的人设也很二啊……
剧情真的很一般，可是动作及枪战设计不输院线大片。人物方面，安志杰无论正反角色依旧好帅，女反派有点年轻版辛芷蕾的即视感，其他反派都太中二晚期神经病了
跟之前其他“战系列”一个水平。不过考虑到这是没多少经费的网大，给个三星，还可以了。安志杰一定要坚持住，直到迎来自己的“叶问”
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
